Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky

The mission of PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY is to support the lifelong sexual health of women and men, and foster a community where every child is a wanted child.

$148k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $22,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $147,540 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $125,040 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NA KEIKI O EMALIA$7,500
PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE$7,500
ART CENTERED$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 15% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE: $8k → 9%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCILS INC: $1.0M → 5%SAFE AND HEALTHY YOUTH WA: $30k → 9%FAIR ANCHORAGE: $100k → 22%NA KEIKI O EMALIA: $8k → 9%Affiliate Chief Executives Councils Inc: $50k → 5%SAFE AND HEALTHY YOUTH WA: $25k → 9%ART CENTERED: $8k → 9%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCILS INC: $35k → 5%SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $125k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$45k · 36% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CENTER FOR CREATIVE INITIATIVE IN HEALTH AND POPULATION (CCIHP) - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS · LIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE COMPANY (LSEC) - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$35k · 28% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PURPOSEFUL PRODUCTIONS - WHAT'S POSSIBLE GRANT - SUPPORT TO OVERCOME ROADBLOCKS IN ORDER TO MAKE OUR PURPOSE POSSIBLE

South Asia$23k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ARROW / YUWA NEPAL - YOUTH ACCESS TO SAFE ABORTION

Central America and the Caribbean$22k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CLINICA DE FAMILIA - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nonpartisan Healthcare Coalition Broken Healthcare Action Fund

Issue Committee to sponsor a ballet measure for cost transparency

2
No on 2

Oppose 2024 Alaska Ballot Measure 2, which would have repealed nonpartisan open primaries and ranked choice voting.

3
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
4
Yes for Portland Clean Energy Fund

Support ballot measure

5
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

6
Healthierhere

Healthierhere is dedicated to reducing health disparities and improving the health and wellbeing of all people in king county through innovative, cross-sector collaborations. this corporation (continued on schedule o)partners with health…

Human Services
7
Yes for Affordable Housing

Support state ballot measure

8
Vote Yes on 113

Supports state ballot Measure 113 that will hold politicians accountable

9
Hawaii Coalition for Health

Promote and protect access to quality health care in Hawaii with emphasis on rural areas. Advocating for patient access rights and providing pediatric primary care. Operating a pediatric primary care clinic in Wahiawa and North Shore Oahu

Health
10
Maika I Health Corporation

To be the patient-centered healthcare home that is accessible for all and be the center for healthcare learning excellence in East Hawaii.

Health
11
Pacific Asian American Women Bay Area Coalition

Represent interests of Asian-Pacific Island Women.

12
Seiu Healthcare 1199NW Multi-Employer Training & Education Fund
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Indian Health Board and the most unlike its peers is No Cuts to Care Pac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC — $1,085,000 · OtherAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INCNo Cuts to Care PAC — $350,000 · OtherNo Cuts to Care PACFair Anchorage No on Prop 1 — $100,000 · OtherFair Anchorage No on Prop 1Safe & Health Youth Washington — $54,999 · Other+1 more — $7,500 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $15,000 · HealthPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED — $7,500 · HealthMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER — $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,597,499Health$22,500Arts & Culture$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC — $1,085,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNo Cuts to Care PAC — $350,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFair Anchorage No on Prop 1 — $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSafe & Health Youth Washington — $54,999 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNA KEIKI O EMALIA — $7,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph