Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc

To advocate for reproductive health and rights by educating policy makers and the public, and to elect candidates that support access to reproductive health care by identifying, educating, and mobilizing voters.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Civil Rights$1.0MHealth$50k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$59,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ISSUES PAC$59,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CALIFORNIA SAFETY NET COALITION DBA COALITION TO PROTECT ACCESS TO HEALTHCA: $214k → 8%YES ON PROPOSITION 1 - PROTECTING CHOICE IN CALIFORNIA A PROJECT OF PPAC: $250k → 12%EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ISSUES PAC: $59k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM IN NEVADA: $250k → 14%FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM INC: $50k → 15%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL COMMITTEE: $50k → 21%KANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INC: $50k → 5%OHIOANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM: $50k → 15%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AKHIIDINKY AND WA: $50k → 9%VERMONT FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY BALLOT COMMITTEE: $50k → 10%NEVADANS FOR EQUAL RIGHTS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MI
OH
CA
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights

Ballot issue political action committee in the State of Ohio to advocate for the passage of a constitutional amendment to protect reproductive rights.

—
2
Nebraskans for Reproductive Freedom

The Protect Our Right Coalition has been created to develop, qualify for the 2024 general election, and pass a constitutional amendment to secure the right to abortion for Nebraskans.

Civil Rights
3
Protect Women Ohio Action Inc

Protect Women Ohio Action is a Section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization and registered ballot committee in the State of Ohio engaged in advocacy activities related to the "Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and…

—
4
One Person One Vote

Ballot issue political action committee to advocate for the defeat of a constitutional amendment that would require a 60% threshold for any future constitutional amendments.

—
5
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

—
6
MEN4CHOICE Advocacy

Mobile Male Allies in the Fight for Reproductive Freedoms

Civil Rights
7
Yes On National Popular Vote

Support "yes" vote on referendum dealing with national popular vote

—
8
Equal Rights for All Petition

Amends Constitution: Specifies that prohibited discrimination includes discrimination concerning gender identity/pregnancy, related health decisions, sexual orientation

—
9
Defend Your Vote

To oppose a Michigan ballot measure

—
10
Nonpartisan Healthcare Coalition Broken Healthcare Action Fund

Issue Committee to sponsor a ballet measure for cost transparency

—
11
Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom

To support a constitutional amendment protecting reproductive freedom in colorado.

—
12
Mayor Breed's Committee for Reproductive Freedom

Ballot measure committee supporting Measure O: San Francisco Reproductive Freedom Act

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom; the most unlike its peers is Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom Pac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
1/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM: $250,000 · OtherNEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOMYES ON PROPOSITION 1 - PROTECTING CHOICE IN CALIFORNIA A PROJECT OF PPAC: $250,000 · OtherYES ON PROPOSITION 1 - PROTECTING CHOICE IN CALIFORNIA A PROJECT OF PPACEquality California Issues PAC: $59,000 · OtherEquality California Issues PACOhioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC: $50,000 · OtherOhioans for Reproductive Freedom PACREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $50,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALLFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM: $50,000 · OtherFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOMKANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INC: $50,000 · OtherKANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INCVERMONT FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY BALLOT COMMITTEE INC: $50,000 · OtherVERMONT FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY BALLOT COMMITTEE INC+1 more: $20,000 · OtherProtect Our Healthcare: $214,482 · Public BenefitProtect Our HealthcarePLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA: $50,000 · Health
Other$829,000Public Benefit$214,482Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetProtect Our Healthcare: $214,482 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetNevadans for Equal Rights: $20,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Action Fund…Planned Parenthood Ac…Open Society Action F…Planned Parenthood Fe…Sixteen Thirty FundPlanned Parenthood of…American Civil Libert…Advocacy Action Fund …
Community Action Fund of Planned Parenthood Orange & San BernardinoCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Action Fund of Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest · American Civil Liberties Union Inc · Advocacy Action Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home