Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pj & Palmina Casella Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$344kFood & Nutrition$15kEnvironment$13kReligion$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kAnimals$9kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE$20,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KATTERING CANCER$7,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$6,000
DRUGFREEORG - PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,500
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK NJ$1,500
MAKE-A-WISH AMERICA$1,500
THE BOWERY MISSION$1,000
TABLE OF HOPE NJ$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$1,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 20%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $300 → 14%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $1k → 20%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $1k → 20%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $1k → 20%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $1k → 20%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $1k → 20%CHOW BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $850 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 22 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$410k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+59%

Still filing today

55%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $139k · revenue +90%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • RJ
    RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -82%
  • BF
    BCC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF BINGHAMTON NY
    one grant, 2019 · $900
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
4
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
12
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE: $138,500 · HealthCMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGERICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,950 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $18,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCMEMORIAL SLOAN KATTERING CANCER: $59,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KATTERING CANCERDRUGFREEORG - PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $25,750 · OtherDRUGFREEORG - PARTNERSHIP TO END A…THE HUMANE SOCIETY: $8,950 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETYFOOD BANK OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $7,155 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE SOUTHERN TIERST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSITAL: $5,000 · Other+22 more: $24,400 · Other+22 moreTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,050 · Human ServicesBroome County Council of Churches: $7,350 · Human ServicesENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,450 · EnvironmentVolunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc: $4,500 · ReligionChristian Herald Association Inc: $4,000 · ReligionEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,750 · Civil Rights
Health$202,450Other$130,255Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Human Services$17,400Environment$11,450Religion$8,500Civil Rights$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE: $138,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,050 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBroome County Council of Churches: $7,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVolunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc: $4,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS MINUTE MEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Broome County Council of Churches ↗
  • Who funds Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS MINUTE MEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pj & Palmina Casella Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pj & Palmina Casella Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Jersey Cares Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pj & Palmina Casella’s filings →

More from the funding graph