Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pitterman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$320kPhilanthropy$9kInternational$5kReligion$2kEnvironment$750Education$645Civil Rights$600Health$325Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$371
Median grant
6
States reached
$176k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$11,000
PLEDGELING FOUNDATION$7,700
URBAN GLASS$7,500
GALVANIZE USA$750
ACCELERATE CHANGE$600
TEMPLE ISREAL$371
GLASS ROOTS$250
MUSEUM ART & DESIGN$225
GUGGENHEIM$150
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM$110
WNET 13$100
THEATRE DEVELOPMENT$42
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ACCELERATE CHANGE: $600 → 16%FILM INDEPENDENT: $5k → 14%BROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA: $200 → 20%GALVANIZE USA: $750 → 14%NETWORK FOR GOOD: $360 → 11%TEMPLE ISREAL: $557 → 9%GLASS ROOTS: $2k → 16%HIAS: $360 → 8%URBAN GLASS: $53k → 20%TEMPLE ISREAL: $371 → 9%GLASS ROOTS: $500 → 16%HIAS: $360 → 8%PLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%URBAN GLASS: $35k → 20%TEMPLE ISREAL: $360 → 9%GLASS ROOTS: $500 → 16%HIAS: $180 → 8%SITI COMPANY: $250 → 17%URBAN GLASS: $33k → 20%GLASS ROOTS: $400 → 16%URBAN GLASS: $14k → 20%GLASS ROOTS: $316 → 16%PS58 PTA: $200 → 20%GLASS ROOTS: $265 → 16%PS58 PTA: $200 → 20%GLASS ROOTS: $250 → 16%URBAN GLASS: $78k → 20%GLASS ROOTS: $180 → 16%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $180 → 17%URBAN GLASS: $50k → 20%URBAN GLASS: $35k → 20%URBAN GLASS: $8k → 20%THEATRE DEVELOPMENT: $202 → 20%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200 → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200 → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200 → 17%ONE TO WORLD: $4k → 17%UNSW & STUDY ABROAD: $1k → 17%ROBINHOOD: $500 → 17%MUSEUM OF ART & DESIGN: $235 → 17%MUSEUM ART & DESIGN: $225 → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $200 → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $189 → 17%WNET 13: $180 → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $200 → 17%ELDRIDGE MUSEUM: $360 → 17%ELDRIDGE MUSEUM: $180 → 17%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NAT HISTORY: $275 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 19 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
25

Total granted

$318k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+73%

Still filing today

47%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UN
    URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $305k · revenue +33%
  • GLASSROOTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +113%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FILM INDEPENDENT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -1%
  • OT
    ONE TO WORLD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
2
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
6
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
9
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
10
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
11
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
12
Institute of Fine Arts Foundation

Supports the nyu institute of fine arts, a division of the nyu graduate school of arts and science; which is devoted to graduate teaching and research in the history of art and archeology and the conservation of works of art.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC: $304,940 · Arts & CultureURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC+6 more: $8,024 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISREAL: $1,288 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherGALVANIZE USA: $750 · OtherWNET 13: $730 · OtherELDRIDGE MUSEUM: $720 · Other+23 more: $4,146 · OtherPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $7,700 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $144 · PhilanthropyONE TO WORLD INC: $3,500 · InternationalHIAS INC: $1,000 · International14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $500 · InternationalGLASSROOTS INC: $3,911 · Youth DevelopmentBROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA INC: $200 · Youth DevelopmentACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $600 · Civil RightsHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $100 · Community ImprovementThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $25 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $20 · Education
Arts & Culture$312,964Other$19,634Philanthropy$8,344International$5,000Youth Development$4,111Civil Rights$600Community Improvement$100Education$45

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC: $304,940 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $7,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLASSROOTS INC: $3,911 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetONE TO WORLD INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $985 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $710 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $389 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $144 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEEX INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGELING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
  • Who funds GLASSROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE TO WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GEEX INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pitterman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pitterman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Glassroots Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pitterman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pitterman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pitterman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph