Skip to content
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$845k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.0MEducation$547kCommunity Improvement$63kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $865,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,288,388 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $422,688 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $250k+1 grant · $845k
$10,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PCMH FOUNDATION$845,000
THE SERVICE LEAGUE OF GREENVILLE INC$10,700
BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NC Medassist: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 5 repeat orgs$612k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$8.9M
$601k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+20%

Still filing today

60%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $4.6M · revenue +98%
  • NI
    NCHA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $395k · revenue +44%
  • EO
    Evergreen of Greenville Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • PC
    PItt Community College
    one grant, 2018 · $500k
  • EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +70%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
2
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
3
The Outer Banks Hospital Inc

To enhance the quality of life for the residents and visitors of dare county and the surrounding region by promoting wellness and providing the highest quality healthcare services.

Health
4
East Carolina Health

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
5
East Carolina Health Dba Ecu Health Community Hospitals

Ecu health community hospitals enhance the quality and management of non-profit hospitals and health care system services.

Health
6
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
7
Wakemed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
8
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Novant Health Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
10
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
11
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
12
Charlotte Medical Dental and Pharmaceutical Association
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PCMH Foundation: $3,761,800 · OtherPCMH FoundationPItt Community College: $500,000 · OtherPItt Community CollegeNCHA INC: $395,030 · OtherNCHA INC+7 more: $138,675 · OtherUniversity Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc: $4,625,000 · HealthUniversity Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundatio…+1 more: $15,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $14,700 · Food & NutritionWASHINGTON-BEAUFORT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,841 · Community ImprovementMedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$4,795,505Health$4,640,000Food & Nutrition$14,700Community Improvement$7,841Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc: $4,625,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetEvergreen of Greenville Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ALBEMARLE: $14,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICE LEAGUE OF GREENVILLE INC: $10,700 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNC PREVENTION PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWASHINGTON-BEAUFORT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,841 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeaufort County United Way Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGREENVILLE-PITT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $5,375 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University Health Sys…North Carolina Commun…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pitt County Memorial Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home