Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pitt County Group Homes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$540kRecreation & Sports$34kPublic Benefit$27kEducation$23kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$1kReligion$750
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$10,642
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACES FOR AUTISM$73,295
AUTISM SOCIETY OF NC$68,037
HEART FOR ENC$25,500
CARENET COUNSELING EAST$20,000
THE REFUGE$13,800
EAST CAROLINA FOUNDATION$12,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
AN AUTASTIC DREAM INC$10,642
Individual grant recipient$10,520
ROCKING HORSE RANCH$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF PITT CO$2,000
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS$1,600
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS$1,400
BUILDING HOPE COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BUILDING HOPE COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER: $1k → 20%CARENET COUNSELING EAST: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$596k · 10 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$596k
$19k

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ACES FOR AUTISM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $173k · revenue -6%
  • AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $123k · revenue +30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $106k

Funded once

  • EU
    EASTERSEALS UCP
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AG
    AYDEN GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • ES
    ECU SPECIAL CARE DENTISTRY ASSOC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $123,059 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INCIndividual grant recipient: $105,963 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $58,485 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $54,500 · OtherEAST CAROLINA FOUNDATIONROCKING HORSE RANCH: $24,650 · OtherROCKING HORSE RANCHEASTERSEALS UCP: $15,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF PITT CO: $14,775 · Other+8 more: $42,978 · Other+8 moreACES FOR AUTISM: $173,295 · HealthACES FOR AUTISMHEART FOR ENC: $27,000 · Public BenefitCARENET COUNSELING EAST: $20,000 · Human ServicesBuilding Hope Community Life Center Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$439,410Health$173,295Public Benefit$27,000Human Services$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACES FOR AUTISM: $173,295 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $123,059 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEART FOR ENC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCARENET COUNSELING EAST: $20,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBuilding Hope Community Life Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACES FOR AUTISM ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART FOR ENC ↗
  • Who funds CARENET COUNSELING EAST ↗
  • Who funds Building Hope Community Life Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of AmericaNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · The Community Foundation of Nc East Inc · Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pitt County Group Homes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pitt County Group Homes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pitt County Group Homes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pitt County Group Homes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pitt County Group Homes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph