Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$144kYouth Development$76kRecreation & Sports$49kHuman Services$21kHealth$18kCrime & Legal$12kArts & Culture$9kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NORTH IDAHO HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LAND AND SEA AVIATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
GRAND GUARDIAN COUNCIL JOBS DAUGHTE$2,500
CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CARLY ORR ARIZONA STATE UNIV: $5k → 11%SHANA GRIMES MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY: $5k → 10%MARIA FITZSIMMONS PILOT TRAINING NW: $5k → 12%NORTHERN AIR: $5k → 12%BRITTANY VIERRA: $5k → 9%JOYANNA RAE ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $5k → 9%RIDGELINE AVIATION: $5k → 10%ROGUE AVIATION: $5k → 10%NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%HANNAH O'CONNER-RIGBY: $5k → 14%MELISSA COOPER MAUNA LOA HELICPOTER: $5k → 9%MICHELLE ASTERGARD MAUNA LOA HELICO: $5k → 15%CEHIHOELUCIN AIR: $5k → 14%NICDE LORD ADVANCED AIR: $5k → 12%REBECCA ZOLTIN LEADING EDGE AVIATIO: $5k → 14%JESSICA MEIRIS COLORADO HELI-OPS: $5k → 9%REBECCA EYER MAUNA LOA HELICOPTERS: $5k → 11%KAREN DARRAH PACIFIC MARITIME INST: $5k → 9%SUMMIT AVIATION: $5k → 12%LAND AND SEA AVIATION: $5k → 10%PILOT TRAINING NORTHWEST: $5k → 12%MELISSA COOPER MAUNA LOA HELICOPTER: $5k → 9%CHRISTINA JORGENSEN MAUNA LOA HELIC: $5k → 15%DARCY BALCARCE PACIFIC MARINE INST: $5k → 9%ANNA RAE REININKN ID HS AVIATION PR: $5k → 12%MINDY NYE MAUNA LOA HELICPOTERS: $5k → 9%CHRISTINA JORGENSEN MAUNA LOA HELIC: $5k → 15%LUCY ALLEN: $5k → 12%EIRKA ZINN EMBRY RIDDLE: $5k → 14%AGNES ULLENIUSMAUNA LOA HELICPOTERS: $5k → 15%NORTH IDAHO HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%LIA KELLE MAUNA LOA HELICOPTERS: $5k → 9%REBECCA EYER MAUNA LOA HELICOPTERS: $5k → 15%BLUE STREAK AIRE: $5k → 12%HOLLY HENDERSON MAUNA LOA HELICOPTE: $5k → 9%NORTH IDAHO HIGH SCHOOL AEROSPACE P: $5k → 12%AQUANIS HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 14%MICHELLE ASTERGARD MAUNA LOA HELICO: $5k → 9%LENA HAUG MAUNA LOA HELICOPTERS: $5k → 12%JENNIFER MARTINE MAUNA LOA HELICOPT: $5k → 9%ANNE SLIPPY CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIV: $5k → 12%JENNIFER MARTINEZ MAUNA LOA HELICOP: $5k → 9%MINDY NYE MAUNA LOA HELICPOTERS: $5k → 9%SOPHIE DIGNAN N ID HS AVIATION PROG: $5k → 12%VANESSA RUIZ-WIARCO BOSTON COLLEGE: $5k → 14%KALILA TUINSTRA N ID HS AVIATION PR: $5k → 12%ROGUE AVIATION: $5k → 14%ABIGAIL ARAUJO PARK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MA
OR
IA
OH
CA
CO
MO
AZ
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 14 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
48

Total granted

$95k
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+42%

Still filing today

21%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +173%
  • NO
    NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • AH
    AQUANIS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • EM
    ELAINE MORRISON LANGLY FLYING SCHOO
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • MF
    MARIA FITZSIMMONS PILOT TRAINING NW
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adventist Health Foundation

The Foundation's mission is to endeavor to support programs and projects that measurably improve the physical and emotional health and health, wholeness and hope is coupled with a vision to transform the well-being in Paradise, and the…

Health
2
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
3
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
4
Community Hospital of San Bernardino

Community hospital of san bernardino ("chsb") is a non-profit, full-service, acute care facility in business to provide acute inpatient care, long-term care and a wide range of ancillary and therapeutic care to the community we serve. our…

Health
5
Redlands Community Hospital Foundation

The mission of redlands community hospital foundation is to advance the delivery of exceptional healthcare in the inland empire through the acquisition, management and utilization of philanthropic funds for redlands community hospital.

Health
6
California Hospitals Committee on Issues

To participate in and educate the public about health issues and ballot proposition activity related to health issues or of concern to hospitals and health systems.

—
7
Central Valley Health Foundation

The Central Valley Health Foundation (CVHF) is a California not-for-profit corporation. The Foundation was organized to coordinate the solicitation of contributions through its operations and to disburse such contributions, earnings, and…

Philanthropy
8
Inland Socal Housing Collective

Creating solutions to improve housing outcomes for renters, homebuyers, homeowners, and those experiencing homelessness through education, advocacy and access to resources in the inland socal region.

Housing & Shelter
9
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
10
Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc

Redwood credit union community fund, inc. will help to make a meaningful impact in advancing the well-being of our communities. our approach is to be respectful and intentional in our giving. we exist to meet the needs of others.

Philanthropy
11
Reedley Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Reedley

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Homes for Good Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+74 more: $326,583 · Other+74 moreDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION-INLAND EMPIRE: $2,500 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthST MARY MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $1,750 · EducationREDLANDS CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureREDLANDS ART ASSOCIATION: $500 · Arts & CultureHOMES FOR GOOD FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Housing & ShelterSALEM DREAM CENTER: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCouncil on Foundations Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$326,583Health$6,000Education$1,750Arts & Culture$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,250Food & Nutrition$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL ORANGE SHOW FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION-INLAND EMPIRE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM DREAM CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStater Bros Charities: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAROLINE PARK: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetREDLANDS ART ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS EMPLOYEES BENEFIT ASSOC-CHARITY FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Annette M Williams Charitable FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pinky and Joe Brier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph