Skip to content
Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$48kPhilanthropy$35kYouth Development$34kArts & Culture$23kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $13,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $74,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,550 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$304M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWNAN-COWETA HISTORICAL SOCIETY I$7,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Coweta Samaritan Clinic: $9k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA: $6k → 14%HOGANSVILLE CHARITABLE TRUST: $8k → 18%MARCH OF DIMES: $10k → 7%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $9k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA: $6k → 14%HOGANSVILLE CHARITABLE TRUST: $8k → 18%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $9k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA: $5k → 14%NEWNAN-COWETA HISTORICAL SOCIETY I: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 5 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -22% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$87k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
-33%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue -81%
  • CS
    COWETA SAMARITAN CLINIC INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $18k · revenue +126%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue -22%

Funded once

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • CW
    COMMUNITY WELCOME HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
2
Cobb Community Foundation Inc

Cobb community foundation's mission is to be a catalyst for a thriving community by mobilizing people, ideas, and resources to improve the quality of life in and around cobb.

Arts & Culture
3
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

—
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Georgia Inc

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in georgia; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys(continued on schedule o) and girls in…

Youth Development
5
Chamber of Commerce of Columbia Cou

To be the leading voice of business in coumbia county providing advocacy, promotion, and benefit solutions to its members.

—
6
Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
7
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
8
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
9
Corporate Volunteer Council of Atlanta

Cvc of atlanta encourages corporate members to develop excellence in corporate volunteerism. develop programs and provide resources.

Community Improvement
10
Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce

Community and economic development

—
11
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
Waccamaw Community Hospital

We help people live better lives through better health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coweta Samaritan Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hogansville Charitable Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCOWETA SAMARITAN CLINIC INC: $18,000 · HealthCOWETA SAMARITAN CLINIC INCMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $34,500 · PhilanthropyCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $17,300 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Metr…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMER…HOGANSVILLE CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHOGANSVILLE…NEWNAN-COWETA HISTORICAL SOCIETY I: $7,500 · OtherNEWNAN-COW…COMMUNITY WELCOME HOUSE: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY …
Health$48,000Philanthropy$34,500Youth Development$34,300Arts & Culture$15,000Other$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $34,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOWETA SAMARITAN CLINIC INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $17,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOGANSVILLE CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWNAN-COWETA HISTORICAL SOCIETY I: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY WELCOME HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Piedmont Newnan Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home