Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

$108k
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Health$124kYouth Development$30kCivil Rights$15kFood & Nutrition$14k
02FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Good Samaritan Health Center$15,000
Cultivate Union$15,000
Mercy Care Foundation$15,000
Covenant House Georgia$15,000
Odyssey Family Counseling$15,000
Center for Black Women's Wellness$15,000
CENTER FOR HELPING OBESITY IN CHILDREN$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Odyssey Family Counseling: $15k → 13%ODYSSEY FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER CORPORATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121k · 5 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$121k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+62%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +95%
  • OF
    ODYSSEY FAMILY COUNSELING CENTERIN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +266%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RUSH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -85%
  • CF
    Community Farmers Markets Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Advanced Practice Nursesinc

The mission of the Community Advanced Practice Nurses (CAPN) is to strengthen the lives of persons who are medically underserved and to help interrupt the cycle of poverty and homelessness for these individuals. Healthy independence is…

2
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
3
Outreach Community Care Network Inc

To effectively support the physical, emotional, social and financial needs of people living with and affected by hiv/aids and other infectious diseases, and to prevent the incidence of new infection

Community Improvement
4
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
5
Community Health Center

Service provide to adults and children who need medical and dental treatment, but lack the financial ability to pay in the western and northern counties of metro atlanta, georgia

Health
6
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
7
Feminist Womens Health Center Inc

The FWHC, which is located in Atlanta, Georgia, provides accessible gynecological health care to all who need it without judgement. As innovative health care leaders, we work collaboratively in the community and nationally to promote…

8
Aid Atlanta Inc

The mission of aid atlanta is to reduce hiv infections and improve the quality of life of its members and the community by breaking barriers and building community. we fulfill that mission by providing an array of comprehensive services…

Health
9
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
10
Thrive Non-Profit Family Medical Center
Health
11
Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

12
Georgia Charitable Care Network Inc

The mission of the Georgia Charitable Care Network is to foster collaborative partnerships to deliver compassionate health care to low income Georgians. Our vision is to that all Georgians will have access to high quality health care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Black Women's Wellness Cbww Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MERCY CARE FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · HealthMERCY CARE FOUNDATION INCTHE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC — $22,200 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INCTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INCThe Center Helping Obesity in Children End Successfully Inc — $10,000 · HealthThe Center Helping Obesity in Children End Suc…COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC — $30,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INCCultivate Union — $15,000 · OtherCultivate UnionTHE RUSH CENTER INC — $15,000 · OtherTHE RUSH CENTER INCODYSSEY FAMILY COUNSELING CENTERIN — $25,000 · Human ServicesODYSSEY FAMILY …UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $15,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…Community Farmers Markets Inc — $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$75,200Other$60,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$15,500Food & Nutrition$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY CARE FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetODYSSEY FAMILY COUNSELING CENTERIN — $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC — $22,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Center Helping Obesity in Children End Successfully Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCommunity Farmers Markets Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Piedmont Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Piedmont Hospital Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Piedmont Hospital Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $434k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph