Skip to content
Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana Inc

Our mission is to create innovative solutions that contribute to healthier communities through caring and collaboration.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.0MCommunity Improvement$100kYouth Development$40kInternational$17kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$10kAnimals$7kHuman Services$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $34,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $91,839 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $57,839 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT WAYNE ALLEN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC$10,750
LOGAN CENTER$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$7,250
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EASTER SEALS: $8k → 12%COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: $6k → 12%COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: $6k → 12%COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: $6k → 12%COMMUNITY TRANS NETWORK: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 6 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$3.2M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+53%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PHP FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +210% · 78% of their budget
  • FW
    FORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +48%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND
    3× · 2019–2021 · $34k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -47%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +53%
  • LF
    LEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +132%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior Achievement of Northern Indiana Foundation Inc

To support the activities of junior achievement of northern indiana, inc.

—
2
The Arc of Northwest Indiana Inc

Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…

Human Services
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
5
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
6
Northeast Indiana Works Inc

The corporation was formed to receive and administer funds for educational, charitable, job training, and workforce development purposes in northeast indiana.

Employment
7
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
8
Pro Bono Indiana Inc

To promote equal access to justice for all indiana residents regardless of economic status

Health
9
Junior Achievement of North Central Michigan Inc

We are empowering young people to own their economic success. Our volunteer-based K-12 programs foster work-readiness, entrepreneurship, and financial literacy skills, and use experiential learning to inspire kids to dream big and reach…

Youth Development
10
The Arc of Opportunity in North Central Massachusetts Inc

To create and support lifetime opportunities in the community for individuals with disabilities and their families to reach their fullest potential by providing advocacy, education, employment, residential and recreational services to…

—
11
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
12
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Php Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHP FOUNDATION INC: $2,992,058 · PhilanthropyPHP FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyFORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $86,000 · Community ImprovementEASTER SEALSARC OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $33,560 · OtherLogan Community Resources Inc: $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $5,250 · OtherCOMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $22,760 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH THE PROTECTOR FDN INC: $6,200 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $34,260 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $17,250 · InternationalLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC: $7,000 · Health
Philanthropy$3,007,058Community Improvement$86,000Other$48,810Human Services$36,460Youth Development$34,260International$17,250Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHP FOUNDATION INC: $2,992,058 over 4y, 78% of budgetFORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $86,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $34,260 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $22,760 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $17,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH THE PROTECTOR FDN INC: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Fou…Edward M Wilson Found…English-Bonter-Mitche…Parkview Health Syste…Aws Foundation IncPhp Foundation IncThe Waterfield Founda…Community Foundation …Flagstar Foundation I…Nisource Charitable F…Journal Gazette Found…Kuhne Charles Char Fd…
Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Parkview Health System Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Php Foundation Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Journal Gazette Foundation Inc · Kuhne Charles Char Fdn T-W Main

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home