· Public charity
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital Inc
We empower every member of the phoebe family to safeguard the health of our communities - embracing a culture that delivers great patient experiences, innovative treatments, and access to superior care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $1,197,287 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,543,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $346,320 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $206k
- $250k+2 grants · $948k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHOEBE FOUNDATION | $697,736 |
| MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC | $250,000 |
| HORIZONS COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS | $156,214 |
| MOUNT UNION COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT | $50,000 |
| ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY | $23,337 |
| HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF ALBANY | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +118% since the first grant, against +96% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPHOEBE FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +132%
- HCHORIZONS COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +118%
- ATALBANY TECH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $714k · revenue +143% · 38% of their budget
Funded once
- SCSHELBY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $240k · revenue +113%
- AAALBANY AREA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $106k · revenue +96%
- KAKEEP ALBANY DOUGHERTY BEAUTIFULone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improvement of the business conditions of agriculture and trade in the mississippi delta communities and in industrial development in the mississippi delta
To provide affordable quality healthcare to low income residents and to educate and promote the interest in healthcare maintenance
The organization's focus is on business recruitment and development, business retention and expansion, and marketing and research for the albany-dougherty county, georgia area.
To promote and publicize the mountain home area.
An academic health sciences system whose responsibilities are to provide a broad range of patient services to the people of eastern new york and western new england.
Provide services to existing and prospective businesses in clinton county, indiana
To provide food to those in need
The exempt purpose of the organization is to provide food and nourishment to those in need.
The albany county land bank facilitates the process of acquiring, improving and redistributing vacant and abandoned properties to eliminate the harms and liabilities caused by such properties and return them to productive use, while being…
Form 990 - organization's mission the albany humane society, inc. is a non-profit corporation formed to prevent cruelty to animals; provide services that assist other agencies in dealing with the legal/health consequences of animals who…
The wilmington chamber of commerce promotes, supports and enhances a positive business environment and improves the quality of life in the community.
Historical museums and genelogical records
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albany Area Primary Health Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHOEBE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds SHELBY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE 4C FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY AREA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds FLINT RIVER FRESH INC ↗
- Who funds Mount Zion Community Reinvestment Corp ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ALBANY INC ↗
- Who funds KEEP ALBANY DOUGHERTY BEAUTIFUL ↗
- Who funds SOWEGA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds FLINT RIVERQUARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Southwest Georgia Inc · Phoebe Putney Health System Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Tr Ua Four-G S Charitable Tr · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.