Skip to content
Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$62kHealth$45kEducation$36kPhilanthropy$18kYouth Development$15kAnimals$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$11,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDRENS WINE FESTIVAL PADDLE RAISE$100,000
YOUTH HAVEN$57,050
NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$6,000
SOLO PARENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUADALUPE CENTER: $26k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $8k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $6k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $3k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $57k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$174k · 5 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +126% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$174k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $72k · revenue +126%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +2%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue +19%
  • TG
    THE GRACE PLACE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
2
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
3
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
4
The Golden Key Center for Exceptional Children Inc

The primary mission of the golden key center for exceptional children is to provide quality education and intervention services to students with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
Child Study Center

The child study center (csc) provides children with complex developmental and behavioral disabilities the highest quality diagnosis, treatment and education to help them achieve their full potential.

Education
6
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
7
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
8
Sycamore Schools Inc

Sycamore School exists so that academically gifted children can experience the enriched, accelerated education they need to reach their potential and lead responsible, constructive, fulfilling lives.

Education
9
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
10
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
11
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creighton University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDRENS WINE FESTIVAL PADDLE RAISE: $100,000 · OtherNAPLES CHILDRENS WINE FESTIVAL PADDLE RAISEGREAT FALLS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $15,000 · OtherGREAT FALLS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICANANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $11,000 · OtherNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INCTHE GRACE PLACE INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE GRACE PLACE INCNAPLES ZOO AT CARIBBEAN GARDENS: $10,000 · OtherNAPLES ZOO AT CARIBBEAN GARDENSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMONSIGNOR FARRELL HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherMONSIGNOR FARRELL HIGH SCHOOL+1 more: $1,000 · OtherYOUTH HAVEN INC: $71,600 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INCGuadalupe Center Inc: $43,500 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncPACE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationPACE UNIVERSI…THE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $18,666 · EducationTHE SUMMIT CE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,750 · PhilanthropySTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$167,000Human Services$115,100Education$44,666Health$25,000Philanthropy$18,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $71,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $43,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $18,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT FALLS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Philip M & Jane Lewis Corwin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home