Skip to content
Philip & Bette Ayoub Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Philip & Bette Ayoub Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$233kYouth Development$23kEducation$11kHealth$4kArts & Culture$2kInternational$1kPhilanthropy$800Human Services$770Other$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$300
Median grant
6
States reached
$372k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH$57,450
ST MARYS CHURCH$18,485
POTTER LEAGUE$1,800
ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$650
RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE$500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET$500
ANCHOR CLUB$500
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$250
ST ANTHONY ORTHODOX CHURCH$250
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$150
NASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION$100
JIMMY FUND$100
Individual grant recipient$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%DANA FARBER: $600 → 7%GOLDEN PAWS: $5k → 10%NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $525 → 21%GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $650 → 14%POTTER LEAGUE: $2k → 7%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $650 → 14%ANCHOR CLUB: $500 → 23%DANA FARBER: $500 → 7%SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $650 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $57k → 10%SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $600 → 14%JIMMY FUND: $600 → 7%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $9k → 10%ST SPYRIDON CHURCH: $1k → 7%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $550 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $9k → 10%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $9k → 10%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $9k → 10%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $8k → 10%ARABIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $7k → 10%ST PAULS ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $7k → 10%RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE: $500 → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $32k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $18k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $15k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $13k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $11k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $9k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $9k → 14%ST MARYS CHURCH: $7k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $5k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $4k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $4k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $3k → 14%PAWTUCKET BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $1k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PAWTUCKET: $500 → 14%PROJECT HOPE: $500 → 14%PROJECT HOPE: $500 → 14%WARM-A-HEART: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
RI
MO
VA
MD
TN
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 15 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$268k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+38%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +38%
  • SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +52%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PB
    PAWTUCKET BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SS
    ST SPYRIDON CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
6
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meeting Street; the most unlike its peers is Nasr Orthodox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH CORPORATION: $114,451 · OtherST PAUL ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH CORPORATIONST MARYS CHURCH: $112,848 · OtherST MARYS CHURCH+37 more: $24,870 · Other+37 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET: $22,300 · Youth DevelopmentSALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · Education+2 more: $150 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,501 · HealthCHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND: $450 · HealthMeeting Street: $100 · HealthNASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION: $850 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $700 · PhilanthropyTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $200 · InternationalINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $50 · InternationalWARM A HEART GINGERBREAD: $50 · Arts & CulturePAWTUCKET SOUP KITCHEN: $25 · Community Improvement
Other$252,169Youth Development$22,300Education$6,150Health$2,051Philanthropy$1,750International$250Arts & Culture$50Community Improvement$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET: $22,300 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,501 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $1,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION: $850 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND: $450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRODEN CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeeting Street: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF BLACKSTONE VALLEY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOLF SCHOOL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWTUCKET SOUP KITCHEN: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET ↗
  • Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds NASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S WISH GROUP OF RHODE ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE GRODEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Meeting Street ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Rhode I…The Rhode Island Comm…Citizens Charitable F…The George and Mary A…Fred M Roddy Foundati…The Beacon FoundationWashington Trust Co C…The Champlin Foundati…Bristol County Saving…Amica Companies Found…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…
United Way of Rhode Island IncRI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The George and Mary Agostini Family Foundation Inc · Fred M Roddy Foundation Inc · The Beacon Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Champlin Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philip & Bette Ayoub Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philip & Bette Ayoub Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Philip & Bette Ayoub’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home