Skip to content

· Public charity

Philanthropy New York Inc

Enhances ability of organizational & individual philanthropists to serve the public good

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$400kHuman Services$300kEmployment$200kYouth Development$100k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC$150,000
EVERGREEN INC$100,000
BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION CORP$100,000
HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD$100,000
YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE & JUSTICE INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $100k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $100k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $150k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $150k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Inc

Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.

Housing & Shelter
2
Green Worker Inc

The organization is based in the south bronx and serves immigrants and communities of color by building, growing, and sustaining worker-owned green businesses to create a strong, local, and democratic economy rooted in racial and gender…

Environment
3
Workforce Development Corporation

Promote workforce development and job creation through activities specifically designed to create skilled workforce in the City of New York.

Education
4
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
5
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
6
Fifth Avenue Committee Inc

Fifth avenue committee's mission is to advance economic, social and racial justice in new york city through its comprehensive community development programs and projects.

—
7
Southwest Brooklyn Industrial Development Corporation

Southwest brooklyn industrial development corporation provides advocacy and services to help businesses in the sunset park, red hook and gowanus neighborhoods grow and create employment opportunities for local residents.

Community Improvement
8
Black and Brown Founders Inc

Black and brown founders inc. is dedicated to fostering a diverse and inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem. we empower entrepreneurs from underrepresented communities with the tools, training, and connections to launch and scale successful…

Education
9
Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc)

Endeavor is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement around the world.

International
10
Boston Impact Initiative Fund

Form 990 - organization's mission or most significant activitiesboston impact initiative (bii) is a nonprofit impact investment fund and certified community development financial institution (cdfi). bii provides small businesses,…

Community Improvement
11
Urban League of Louisiana

To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.

Human Services
12
The Business Initiative Corporation of New York

The mission of the business initiative corporation of new york (bicny) is to support economic development and induce private investments in new york state by providing below-market interest rate loans and long-term capital for the business…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Communities Collaborative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Give for the Future Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INCHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $200,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTDBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterBedford Stuyvesant Res…EVERGREEN INC YOUR NORTH BROOKLYN BUSINESS EXCHANGE: $200,000 · Community ImprovementEVERGREEN INC YOUR NOR…YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $100,000 · OtherYOUTH MINIS…
Human Services$500,000Housing & Shelter$200,000Community Improvement$200,000Other$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $300,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $200,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $200,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetEVERGREEN INC YOUR NORTH BROOKLYN BUSINESS EXCHANGE: $200,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Philanthropy New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Philanthropy New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $834k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Philanthropy New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph