Skip to content

· Public charity

Phelps Memorial Health Center

To always provide exceptional quality and compassionate care for the families we serve.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$87kPublic Safety & Disaster$54kEducation$40kHealth$37kHuman Services$27kRecreation & Sports$16kCrime & Legal$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $62,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $67,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$192M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
LOOMIS RURAL FIRE DISTRICT #4$10,000
HOLDREGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
CHRISTIAN HOMES CARE COMMUNITY$6,000
SOUTH CENTRAL AREA RECOVERY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SAFE CENTER: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 6 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$120k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-23%

Still filing today

83%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHRISTIAN HOMES INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +58%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PRAIRIE
    2× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +143%
  • HM
    HOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • WF
    WILCOX FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • CO
    CITY OF HOLDREGE - POLICE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BV
    BERTRAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTVILLAGE OF BERTRAND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
2
Colony Retirement Homes of Holden Inc

Colony retirement homes of holden, inc. is dedicated to providing affordable housing for seniors of low and moderate income.

Housing & Shelter
3
South Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

To promote area commerce

—
4
Hays Area Chamber of Commerce

The hays area chamber of commerce will be the catalyst for bringing the business community together with other organizations and the community at large to keep the hays area viable; to foster a better business climate; and promote a higher…

—
5
Mcpherson Chamber of Commerce

To work as an organization of individuals, businesses, and professionals to enhance the economic, civic, and cultural interests of the mcpherson area.

—
6
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
7
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
8
Cody Country Chamber of Commerce

Promote and develop local business.

—
9
Shelby County Chamber of Commerce Inc

We advocate for business growth and support the success of our members while collaborating with partners to promote shelby county as a highly desirable community in which to live, work, and play.

—
10
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
11
Fairfield Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote local businesses and business development in fairfield, iowa

—
12
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phelps County Development Corp; the most unlike its peers is Holdrege Amer Legion Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLAGE OF BERTRAND: $17,076 · OtherVILLAGE OF BERTRANDCHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $16,055 · OtherCHRISTIAN HOMES INCWILCOX FIRE DEPARTMENT: $15,000 · OtherWILCOX FIRE DEPARTMENTHOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INC: $10,434 · OtherHOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INCCITY OF HOLDREGE - POLICE DEPARTMENT: $10,350 · OtherCITY OF HOLDREGE - POLICE DEPARTMENTHOLDREGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 · OtherHOLDREGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCELOOMIS RURAL FIRE DISTRICT #4: $10,000 · OtherLOOMIS RURAL FIRE DISTRICT #4BERTRAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTVILLAGE OF BERTRAND: $9,727 · OtherBERTRAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTVILLAGE OF B…PhelpsHarlan County CASA: $6,970 · OtherPhelpsHarlan County CASABEAVER CITY AMBULANCE: $5,600 · OtherPHELPS COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5,000 · OtherPHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $74,806 · PhilanthropyPHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUND…PHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $40,000 · Community ImprovementPHELPS COUNTY DEVE…SOUTH CENTRAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $7,450 · Community ImprovementSOUTH CENTRAL ECON…SOUTH CENTRAL AREA RECOVERY INC: $21,000 · HealthSOUTH CENTRAL …YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PRAIRIE: $15,000 · HealthYOUNG MENS CHR…HOLDREGE AMER LEGION BASEBALL INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SPOUSE SEXUAL ABUSE FAMILY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,698 · Human Services
Other$116,212Philanthropy$74,806Community Improvement$47,450Health$36,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Human Services$5,698

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $74,806 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $40,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL AREA RECOVERY INC: $21,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $16,055 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PRAIRIE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INC: $10,434 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOLDREGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $7,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLDREGE AMER LEGION BASEBALL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE SPOUSE SEXUAL ABUSE FAMILY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,698 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Phelps County Community Foundation IncNE28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Phelps County Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phelps Memorial Health Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phelps Memorial Health Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phelps Memorial Health Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph