· Public charity
Phelps Memorial Health Center
To always provide exceptional quality and compassionate care for the families we serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $62,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $67,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| LOOMIS RURAL FIRE DISTRICT #4 | $10,000 |
| HOLDREGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN HOMES CARE COMMUNITY | $6,000 |
| SOUTH CENTRAL AREA RECOVERY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -38% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHRISTIAN HOMES INC2× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +58%
- YMYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PRAIRIE2× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +143%
- HMHOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INC2× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- WFWILCOX FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2023 · $15k
- COCITY OF HOLDREGE - POLICE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2021 · $10k
- BVBERTRAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTVILLAGE OF BERTRANDone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the quality of the siouxland area
Colony retirement homes of holden, inc. is dedicated to providing affordable housing for seniors of low and moderate income.
To promote area commerce
The hays area chamber of commerce will be the catalyst for bringing the business community together with other organizations and the community at large to keep the hays area viable; to foster a better business climate; and promote a higher…
To work as an organization of individuals, businesses, and professionals to enhance the economic, civic, and cultural interests of the mcpherson area.
To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.
Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.
Promote and develop local business.
We advocate for business growth and support the success of our members while collaborating with partners to promote shelby county as a highly desirable community in which to live, work, and play.
To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.
To promote local businesses and business development in fairfield, iowa
To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phelps County Development Corp and the most unlike its peers is Holdrege Amer Legion Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHELPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PHELPS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL AREA RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PRAIRIE ↗
- Who funds HOLDREGE MEMORIAL HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds HOLDREGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds HOLDREGE AMER LEGION BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPOUSE SEXUAL ABUSE FAMILY EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Phelps County Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phelps Memorial Health Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.