Skip to content

· Public charity

Pharmaceutical Care Management Association

Pcma's vision and mission are to help people optimize prescription drug therapy to live healthier lives.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.6MHealth$850kEducation$8k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $1,227,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,467,925 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $240,025 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC$1,000,000
PCMA FOUNDATION$100,000
JOBS FIRST COALITION$25,000
COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE$12,000
REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$12,000
THURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION$10,300
DEMOCRATIC LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$10,000
GOPAC$10,000
MIKE MCGUIRE FOR INSURANCE COMMISSIONER 2026$10,000
FRIENDS FOR KATHY HOCHUL$10,000
WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP INC$7,500
DR AKILAH WEBER FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 2024$5,500
JOHN F MCKEON FOR SENATE$5,200
ELECTION FUND OF CRAIG COUGHLIN$5,200
NEW JERSEY SENATE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REPUBLICAN LEGISLATIVE VICTORY FUND: $10k → 11%ONE MINNESOTA INAUGURAL COMMITTEE: $10k → 14%MIKE MCGUIRE FOR INSURANCE COMMISSIONER 2026: $10k → 10%CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY: $15k → 12%FRIENDS FOR KATHY HOCHUL: $10k → 17%TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC: $1.0M → 14%FRIENDS OF RANDY FINE: $20k → 14%EFO HERB CONAWAY FOR ASSEMBLY: $5k → 8%WISCONSIN VALUES: $15k → 10%BILL LEE INAUGURAL: $8k → 14%GEORGIA HOUSE REPUBLICAN TRUST: $10k → 11%GEORGIA WINS: $8k → 13%NCSL: $8k → 12%TODD HUSTON FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE: $6k → 16%REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%THURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%COALITION FOR A STRONGER WEST VIRGINIA: $20k → 18%DEMOCRATIC ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $14k → 7%DIMAIO FOR ASSEMBLY: $5k → 7%ELECTION FUND OF CRAIG COUGHLIN: $5k → 8%NEW JERSEY SENATE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY: $14k → 10%JOHN F MCKEON FOR SENATE: $5k → 16%GOPAC: $10k → 7%NEVADA INAUGURAL COMMITTEE: $10k → 13%REPUBLICAN LEGISLATIVE VICTORY FUND: $8k → 11%WOMEN IN POWER (WIP PAC): $10k → 12%DEMOCRATIC LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $15k → 14%COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE: $12k → 10%ELECTION FUND OF JOSEPH VITALE: $6k → 8%NEW JERSEY SENATE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY: $5k → 10%ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY: $14k → 11%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP INC: $8k → 12%DEMOCRATIC LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $10k → 14%COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE: $12k → 10%DR AKILAH WEBER FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 2024: $6k → 12%PCMA FOUNDATION: $550k → 14%REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $12k → 10%PCMA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $12k → 10%PCMA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $12k → 10%PCMA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE: $12k → 10%REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE: $45k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
IN
OH
NJ
CA
CO
WV
VA
AZ
AR
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
28

Total granted

$1.1M
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-39%

Still filing today

29%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PCMA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $850k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%
  • C
    CERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $36k

Funded once

  • RS
    Republican State Leadership
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • HD
    HEALEY DRISCOLL TRANSITION COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RANDY FINE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Jobs Council

To provide the voters of michigan with an understanding of how current policy initiatives will affect michigan's economic well-being.

—
2
Make Michigan First

To receive and administer funds that will be used to educate michigan's citizens on economic, educational, health care, land use issues, and to promote the free market economy, civic betterment, social improvement and democracy in michigan.

Social Science
3
Wisconsin First Inc

To promote social welfare, including but not limited to, promoting policies and supporting legislation that advance the interests of Wisconsin families an businesses by preserving jobs, promoting an economically competitive environment for…

—
4
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
5
Civic Consulting Minnesota

Ccm helps local governments achieve significant and measurable improvements by giving them the tools to be more efficient. we do this by providing private sector pro bono expertise to solve specific, tangible problems for governmental…

—
6
Put Progress First

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…

—
7
Fix the System-Wisconsin Action Inc

Promote & support nonpartisan political innovation in wisconsin by engaging in legislative and outreach activity to implement a strategy of innovations and reforms to open up competition in the politics industry.

Membership Benefit
8
Illinois Coalition for Jobs Growth and Prosperity

To promote job growth and communicate important issues to the public through information campaigns.

Community Improvement
9
Working for Wisconsin Inc

To promote social welfare including but not limited to informing the public and policymakers on the importance of wisconsin's construction work to the state's economy, the vitality of its communities, and the lives of its citizens.

Employment
10
Small Business for a Better Michigan

To promote free enterprise and protect small businesses against misleading and damaging ballot proposals.

—
11
Elevated Voices Inc

Voter education around policy

—
12
Michigan Future First

To provide citizens of michigan with an understanding of how current policy initiatives will affect their well-being, as well as support public policies on the federal, state, and local level that will bring about civic betterments and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jobs First Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women in California Leadership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000,000 · OtherTRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC+38 more: $497,300 · Other+38 morePCMA FOUNDATION: $850,000 · HealthPCMA FOUNDATIONTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC: $100,000 · EmploymentCOALITION FOR A STRONGER WEST VIRGINIA: $20,000 · Community ImprovementLEADERSHIP MATTERS MN: $10,000 · EducationWomen in California Leadership Inc: $7,500 · Education
Other$1,497,300Health$850,000Employment$100,000Community Improvement$20,000Education$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPCMA FOUNDATION: $850,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR A STRONGER WEST VIRGINIA: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWISCONSIN VALUES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $10,300 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP MATTERS MN: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetSERVICE FIRST FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMICHIGAN TRANSITION 2019: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWomen in California Leadership Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds PCMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR A STRONGER WEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN VALUES INC ↗
  • Who funds THURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP MATTERS MN ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE FIRST FUND ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN TRANSITION 2019 ↗
  • Who funds Women in California Leadership Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC37.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Wisconsin Beer Distributors Association Inc C/O the Kammer Gr · Water Sports Industry Association Inc · Wisconsin Insurance Alliance · Wisconsin Bankers Association · Alliance of Health Insurers Ua · Edison Electric Institute Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pharmaceutical Care Management Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pharmaceutical Care Management Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pharmaceutical Care Management Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph