· Public charity
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
Pcma's vision and mission are to help people optimize prescription drug therapy to live healthier lives.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $1,227,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,467,925 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $240,025 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $99k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC | $1,000,000 |
| PCMA FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| JOBS FIRST COALITION | $25,000 |
| COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE | $12,000 |
| REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE | $12,000 |
| THURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $10,300 |
| DEMOCRATIC LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
| GOPAC | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS FOR KATHY HOCHUL | $10,000 |
| MIKE MCGUIRE FOR INSURANCE COMMISSIONER 2026 | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP INC | $7,500 |
| DR AKILAH WEBER FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 2024 | $5,500 |
| NEW JERSEY SENATE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY | $5,200 |
| ELECTION FUND OF CRAIG COUGHLIN | $5,200 |
| JOHN F MCKEON FOR SENATE | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPCMA FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $850k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
- TJTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%
- CCERS3× · 2022–2024 · $36k
Funded once
- RSRepublican State Leadershipone grant, 2022 · $45k
- HDHEALEY DRISCOLL TRANSITION COMMITTEEone grant, 2022 · $25k
- FOFRIENDS OF RANDY FINEone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide the voters of michigan with an understanding of how current policy initiatives will affect michigan's economic well-being.
To receive and administer funds that will be used to educate michigan's citizens on economic, educational, health care, land use issues, and to promote the free market economy, civic betterment, social improvement and democracy in michigan.
To promote social welfare, including but not limited to, promoting policies and supporting legislation that advance the interests of Wisconsin families an businesses by preserving jobs, promoting an economically competitive environment for…
Social welfare and issue advocacy
Ccm helps local governments achieve significant and measurable improvements by giving them the tools to be more efficient. we do this by providing private sector pro bono expertise to solve specific, tangible problems for governmental…
To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, the State of Michigan; To support public policies on the federal, state, and…
Promote & support nonpartisan political innovation in wisconsin by engaging in legislative and outreach activity to implement a strategy of innovations and reforms to open up competition in the politics industry.
To promote job growth and communicate important issues to the public through information campaigns.
To promote social welfare including but not limited to informing the public and policymakers on the importance of wisconsin's construction work to the state's economy, the vitality of its communities, and the lives of its citizens.
To promote free enterprise and protect small businesses against misleading and damaging ballot proposals.
Voter education around policy
To provide citizens of michigan with an understanding of how current policy initiatives will affect their well-being, as well as support public policies on the federal, state, and local level that will bring about civic betterments and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jobs First Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women in California Leadership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds PCMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A STRONGER WEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN VALUES INC ↗
- Who funds THURSTON COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN TRANSITION 2019 ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP MATTERS MN ↗
- Who funds SERVICE FIRST FUND ↗
- Who funds Women in California Leadership Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Wisconsin Beer Distributors Association Inc C/O the Kammer Gr · Water Sports Industry Association Inc · Wisconsin Insurance Alliance · Wisconsin Bankers Association · Alliance of Health Insurers Ua · Edison Electric Institute Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pharmaceutical Care Management Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.