Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peterson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MRecreation & Sports$1.0MHuman Services$487kEnvironment$90kYouth Development$61kHealth$60kPhilanthropy$54kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK$150,000
CAMP HIGH HOPES$45,000
CAMP FOSTER YMCA$20,000
OKOBOJI YACHT CLUB SAILING SCHOOL$20,000
OKOBOJI FOUNDATION$18,000
IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$15,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY$5,000
OKOBOJI SUMMER THEATRE$5,000
THE CRADLE FOUNDATION$5,000
MAPLE VALLEY-ANTHON OTO COMMUNITY SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $356k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP FOSTER YMCA: $70k → 7%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CAMP FOSTER YMCA: $20k → 7%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CAMP FOSTER YMCA: $20k → 7%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CAMP FOSTER YMCA: $20k → 7%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CRADLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $45k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $40k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $40k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $40k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $6k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $5k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $5k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
SD
IA
OH
UT
NE
MO
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 40 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+17%

Still filing today

55%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Buena Vista University
    5× · 2018–2022 · $500k · revenue +4%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY IOWA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $300k · revenue +156% · 26% of their budget
  • CH
    CAMP HIGH HOPES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $181k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE OF SIOUXLAND
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    IOWA GREAT LAKES TRAILS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
2
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
3
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
4
Siouxland Pace Inc

To improve the health of the people and the communities we serve.

Health
5
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
6
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
7
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
8
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc

Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.

Health
9
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
10
Realtor Association of the Sioux Empire Inc

To offer leadership, involvement and support; encouraging the membership to professionally achieve their goals and serve all in the spirit of the golden rule.

—
11
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
12
St Luke's Health Foundation of Sioux City Iowa

To enhance the quality of life for the people of the siouxland region by obtaining funds in support of the health-care mission of st. luke's health system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/a Greater Des Moines Community Fdn; the most unlike its peers is Okoboji Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAKOTA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $400,500 · OtherDAKOTA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICTBOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY IOWA: $300,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY IOWAARNOLDS PARK AMUSEMENT PARK: $135,000 · OtherARNOLDS PARK AMUSEMENT PARKOKOBOJI FOUNDATION: $103,000 · OtherOKOBOJI FOUNDATIONOKOBOJI YATCH CLUB SAILING SCHOOL: $84,000 · OtherOKOBOJI YATCH CLUB SAILING SCHOOLTHE WARMING SHELTER INC: $50,000 · Other+34 more: $372,232 · Other+34 moreBuena Vista University: $500,000 · EducationBuena Vista UniversitySTEPHENS COLLEGE: $57,000 · EducationSTEPHENS COLLEGEFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC: $25,250 · Education+5 more: $47,500 · Education+5 moreHISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK INC: $455,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC ARNOLDS…+5 more: $12,600 · Arts & CultureCAMP HIGH HOPES: $181,000 · Human ServicesCAMP HIGH HO…Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $130,000 · Human ServicesCamp Foster …The Cradle Foundation: $45,000 · Human ServicesThe Cradle F…SIOUXLAND YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $51,025 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $4,000 · HealthHEALTH INC HOSPICE: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,444,732Education$629,750Arts & Culture$467,600Human Services$356,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Environment$65,000Health$58,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBuena Vista University: $500,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK INC: $455,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY IOWA: $300,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetCAMP HIGH HOPES: $181,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $130,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSIOUXLAND YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $57,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $51,025 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WARMING SHELTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe Cradle Foundation: $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC: $25,250 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEPLACE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOKOBOJI YACHT CLUB SAILING SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH INC HOSPICE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHEUM THEATRE PRESERVATION PROJECTLTD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE MANOR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSECRANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SIOUXLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY IOWA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HIGH HOPES ↗
  • Who funds Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHENS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARMING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Cradle Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds OKOBOJI YACHT CLUB SAILING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri River Historical Development IncIA42.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri River Historical Development Inc · The Chesterman Family Foundation · Aalfs Family Foundation · Berenstein Family Foundation · Waitt Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation · Gleeson Family Foundation · Ronald B and Joan B Krage Foundation · The Roth & Letch Family Charitable Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Greenberg Foundation · Michael & Marjory Bennett Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peterson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peterson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peterson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peterson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peterson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph