Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$54kRecreation & Sports$35kPhilanthropy$29kFood & Nutrition$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kHuman Services$7kCommunity Improvement$6kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$673k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESSENTIAL HEALTH VIRINIA REGIONAL FOUNDATION$9,000
WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB$4,750
FOUNDATION FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS$3,500
MARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$3,000
FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC$3,000
HOUSTON ARTS ALLIANCE$2,250
USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION$2,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 9%LANFEST: $3k → 11%MESABI RANGE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%VILLANOVA: $6k → 10%BRIGHTER EDUCATION (BED): $2k → 9%HOUSTON ARTS ALLIANCE: $2k → 16%MARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 11%WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $5k → 8%USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%HERO'S HARVEST: $3k → 12%FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $3k → 19%NEW ALBANY PARKS: $3k → 15%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 14%PROJECT HEALING WATERS: $3k → 8%LANFEST: $2k → 11%MEABI RANGE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%VILLANOVA: $4k → 10%JJ PACKS: $3k → 11%WEST MILLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $5k → 8%FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $3k → 19%NEW ALBANY PARKS: $3k → 15%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $2k → 14%LANFEST: $2k → 11%MESABI RANGE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 15%MAKING KINDNESS CONTAGIOUS: $3k → 10%THE CODE ACADEMY: $3k → 16%JJ PACKS: $3k → 11%BRASSFIELD PTA: $4k → 8%FOOD FINDERS: $3k → 19%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $3k → 11%VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%FAMILY TO FAMILY: $2k → 16%JJ PACKS: $3k → 11%BRASSFIELD PTA: $3k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS: $4k → 11%VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE BALLARD HOUSE: $2k → 16%AUSTRALIAN SHEPHERD RESCUE IN MICHIGAN: $2k → 11%ESSENTIAL HEALTH VIRINIA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $9k → 15%MECA: $2k → 16%JJ PACKS: $2k → 11%MESABI FIT COALITION: $7k → 15%ADVANTURE TEAM: $1k → 11%VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%UPAWS: $3k → 11%AEOA: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
CO
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 9 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$96k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MESABI RANGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +3%
  • WM
    West Millbrook Middle School
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • MF
    MESABI FIT COALITION
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

—
2
Valley City State University Foundation

Valley City State University Foundation aids in the advancement of Valley City State University by awarding scholarships and by promoting the University. Support comes primarily from contributions by individuals and businesses, fundraising…

—
3
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
4
Vestavia Hills City Schools Foundation

The vestavia hills city schools foundation exists to provide perpetual financial support to each of vestavia hills city school and to protect and foster the standard of academic excellence in the school system.

Philanthropy
5
Va Foundation for Independent Colleges

To secure financial support that enables college-bound students to access and graduate from outstanding virginia independent higher education institutions.

Education
6
Cape Henry Collegiate School Students' Assistance Foundation Inc

The purpose of the chcs students' assistance foundation is to provide need-based financial aid to impoverished students' attending cape henry collegiate school. funding for the foundation is dependent upon donations and upon proceeds…

—
7
Austin Community College Foundation

Making education accessible for students through philanthropic support, aligned with Austin Community College (ACC) strategic priorities.

Education
8
Bedford County Regional Education Foundation

Support students at the Allegany College of Maryland - Bedford County campus.

Education
9
Northern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc

NOVA Foundation supports the college's goal of providing all students with a high-quality, life-changing education. The Foundation raises private funds to enhance nova programs, create student scholarships and offer awards to faculty for…

—
10
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
11
Mesquite Isd Education Foundation Inc

To create and sustain a visionary coalition of businesses and citizens generating investments and funding for innovative programs and initiatives that enrich edcuational opportunities in Mesquite ISD.

Philanthropy
12
Ussa Investment Fund

Operates exclusively to manage the investment of endowment gifts made for the benefit of supporting the development, training, and competition of elite national, international, and development athletes in skiing and snowboarding.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Summit Foundation; the most unlike its peers is West Millbrook Middle School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESABI RANGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherMESABI RANGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $9,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVILLANOVA: $9,500 · OtherVILLANOVAESSENTIAL HEALTH VIRINIA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherESSENTIAL HEALTH VIRINIA REGIONAL FOUNDATIONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6,750 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSELANFEST: $6,000 · OtherBrassfield PTA: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · Other+13 more: $30,000 · Other+13 moreVirginia Community Foundation: $24,000 · PhilanthropyVirginia Communi…THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SUMMIT FOUND…West Millbrook Middle School: $9,250 · EducationWest Millbr…FOUNDATION FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS: $3,500 · EducationFOUNDATION …VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,750 · EducationVILLANOVA U…Code Academy: $2,500 · EducationCode Academ…Avondale House Inc: $1,000 · EducationMESABI FIT COALITION: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION: $2,250 · Recreation & SportsFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $8,500 · Food & NutritionHouston Arts Alliance: $2,250 · Arts & CultureCINCO CHARITIES INC: $1,750 · Health
Other$117,500Philanthropy$26,500Education$19,000Recreation & Sports$9,250Food & Nutrition$8,500Arts & Culture$2,250Health$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESABI RANGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetVirginia Community Foundation: $24,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetWest Millbrook Middle School: $9,250 over 2y, 15% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMESABI FIT COALITION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBrassfield PTA: $6,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCode Academy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCO CHARITIES INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAvondale House Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESABI RANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds West Millbrook Middle School ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MESABI FIT COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Brassfield PTA ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Code Academy ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds USA VOLLEYBALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Houston Arts Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CINCO CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Avondale House Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Peter and Colette Johnson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter and Colette Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph