Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$19kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$4kEmployment$3kYouth Development$2kAnimals$2kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Multiple Sclerosis Society$3,500
Nik Wallenda FOundation$2,500
Wounded Warrior Project$250
ST Judes Children's Hosp$250
WUSF$250
Big Brothers Big Sisters$250
Hillsdale$200
Sherriff's Youth Ranch$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Jewish Federation of Sarasota$75
American Heart Association$75
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $298) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Eagles for Children: $102 → 10%Eagles for Children: $100 → 10%Eagles for Children: $96 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31k · 19 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$31k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+77%

Still filing today

37%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +115%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +126%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MF
    Mitchell Fund
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • OO
    Out of Door Academy
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

4
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
5
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
11
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Star Children's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eagles for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

National Multiple Sclerosis Society — $15,450 · OtherNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyIndividual grant recipient — $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNik Wallenda FOundation — $2,500 · OtherNik Wallenda FOundationMitchell Fund — $2,000 · OtherMitchell FundEaster Seals — $1,925 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters — $1,685 · Other+23 more — $8,150 · Other+23 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,850 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $375 · HealthGOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC — $2,050 · EmploymentOPEN BOOKS LTD — $1,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami — $275 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $200 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,100 · Human ServicesEAGLES FOR CHILDREN — $298 · Human ServicesFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $950 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $450 · International
Other$37,210Health$2,225Employment$2,050Education$1,475Human Services$1,398Arts & Culture$950International$450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC — $2,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES FOR CHILDREN — $298 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVELAND CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES - MANASOTA INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD
  • Who funds FLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds EAGLES FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds ALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LOVELAND CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization DRS PETER A WISH AND LESLIEBETH BERGER Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph