Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$472k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.8MEducation$2.2MAnimals$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.4MHealth$1.3MReligion$742kCivil Rights$372kFood & Nutrition$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $208k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY BIRMINGHAM AREA COMMAND$100,000
BIG OAK RANCH INC$58,000
ADY'S BIG ARMY$50,000
HAND IN PAW$35,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES (TUSCALOOSA)$30,000
HERCHOICE$26,750
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF PANAMA CITY$25,000
GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$25,000
TAPS ANIMAL SHELTER$25,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$15,000
COMMUNITY KITCHENS$10,000
THE BELL CENTER$10,000
COAST GUARD FOUNDATION$10,000
IMMANUEL COUNSELING MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $10k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $545k → 13%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $10k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $544k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $541k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $58k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $55k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $49k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $44k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $44k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $43k → 13%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $5k → 16%SAV A LIFE: $300 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 69 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
72

Total granted

$9.1M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+14%

Still filing today

57%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +105%
  • Samford University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +60%
  • TG
    THE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $361k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • CT
    CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • NF
    NRAILA FREEDOM ACTION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • WT
    WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
2
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

—
3
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
4
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
5
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Alabama Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics

Obtain optimal health & well-being for all children in alabama, and to provide educational and practice support for its membership so the highest quality of medical care can be achieved.

Health
8
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
9
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
10
Alabama Policy Institute Inc

The primary mission of the alabama policy institute, inc. is to provide information to the people of alabama about primarily statewide legislative activity, and to promote and defend policies that preserve the principles of free markets,…

—
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Service Dogs Alabama Inc

Service dogs alabama trains and provides service dogs for people with medical and psychiatric disablilites as well as intervention facility dogs. service dogs alabama provides recipients with confidence and independence enabling them to…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Barber Vintage Motorsports Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
43/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY BIRMINGHAM AREA COMMAND: $435,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY BIRMINGHAM AREA COMMANDHERCHOICE: $315,750 · OtherHERCHOICEPANAMA CITY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $275,000 · OtherPANAMA CITY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES (TUSCALOOSA): $270,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES (TUSCALOOSA)NRAILA FREEDOM ACTION FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherEmpty Stocking Fund Inc: $250,000 · OtherTAPS ANIMAL SHELTER: $230,100 · OtherJOEL OSTEEN MINISTRIES: $225,000 · Other+99 more: $1,798,590 · Other+99 moreBIG OAK RANCH INC: $1,923,100 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INC+4 more: $55,300 · Human ServicesHAND IN PAW INC: $815,000 · AnimalsHAND IN PAW …THE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $360,600 · AnimalsTHE GREATER …Birmingham Zoo Inc: $45,000 · Animals+5 more: $32,800 · AnimalsSamford University: $1,180,762 · EducationSamford Univ…+7 more: $63,600 · EducationHelen Keller Foundation for Research & E Research & Education Inc: $700,000 · HealthHelen Keller…THE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS: $297,500 · HealthTHE BELL CEN…LAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthLAKESHORE FO…SMILE-A-MILE: $45,000 · Health+8 more: $121,700 · Health+8 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $243,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS INC: $12,200 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCommunity Kitchens of Birmingham: $90,000 · Food & NutritionSECOR: $27,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,049,440Human Services$1,978,400Animals$1,253,400Education$1,244,362Health$1,234,200Youth Development$256,200Food & Nutrition$117,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $1,923,100 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetSamford University: $1,180,762 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHAND IN PAW INC: $815,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetHelen Keller Foundation for Research & E Research & Education Inc: $700,000 over 7y, 43% of budgetTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $360,600 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS: $297,500 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund Inc: $250,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $243,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST LAW INSTITUTE: $101,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetWESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBARBER VINTAGE MOTORSPORTS MUSEUM: $90,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Kitchens of Birmingham: $90,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $45,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetIMMANUEL COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS OF METRO ALABAMAINC: $45,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSECOR: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIRMINGHAM THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $25,300 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetThe Birmingham Athletic Partnership: $25,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS: $17,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $16,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORKSHOPS EMPOWERMENT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS INC: $12,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BIRMINGHAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern IL: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A GOLDEN BIRMINGHAM INC: $9,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY: $9,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $7,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN H AND KATHERINE SHADE PEKIN MEMORIAL YOUTH CAMP: $6,590 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetSTUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCROONIN FOR CRITTERS: $6,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN PAW INC ↗
  • Who funds Helen Keller Foundation for Research & E Research & Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST LAW INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds BARBER VINTAGE MOTORSPORTS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Community Kitchens of Birmingham ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
  • Who funds IMMANUEL COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRIME STOPPERS OF METRO ALABAMAINC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL55.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Protective Life Foundation · Nall-Whatley Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Holle Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pete M Hanna’s filings →

    More from the funding graph