Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perry Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$342k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$7.7MReligion$5.0MInternational$4.4MCommunity Improvement$533kEducation$360kFood & Nutrition$335kHealth$290kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $342k
$80,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$275k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVESTING IN SPANISH$342,000
MATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME$212,000
FAMILIES OF FANA$145,000
MY LIFE SPEAKS$125,000
THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$125,000
DAVID STOCKWELL EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$120,000
TODAY THE BIBLE & YOU$120,000
LIFEHOUSE OF HOUSTON$110,000
PRESTONWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH$80,000
LOVE HEALS YOU US$75,000
REDEEMED WOMEN$60,000
GOOD SHEPHERD INDIA$50,000
TIERCE GREEN MINISTRIES$50,000
ANGEL REACH$50,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FAMILIES OF FANA: $310k → 13%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $281k → 8%FAMILIES OF FANA: $156k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%BETHELS PLACE: $140k → 16%FAMILIES OF FANA: $145k → 13%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $192k → 8%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $10k → 9%FAMILIES OF FANA: $140k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $180k → 8%FAMILIES OF FANA: $137k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $125k → 8%BETHELS PLACE: $60k → 16%FAMILIES OF FANA: $115k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $110k → 8%FAMILIES OF FANA: $110k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%BETHEL'S FAMILY CHRISIAN ACADEMY: $55k → 16%FAMILIES OF FANA: $70k → 13%HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%ANGEL REACH: $50k → 9%BETHEL'S PLACE: $50k → 16%FAMILIES OF FANA: $60k → 13%THE HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%ANGEL REACH: $50k → 9%BETHEL'S FAMILY CHRISIAN ACADEMY: $50k → 16%SERVENOW: $180k → 9%SERVENOW: $150k → 9%BETHELS PLACE: $45k → 16%SERVENOW: $110k → 9%BETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $40k → 16%SERVENOW: $50k → 9%BETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $35k → 16%SERVENOW: $50k → 9%SERVENOW: $30k → 9%BETHEL'S PLACE: $35k → 16%BETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CO
MO
VA
TN
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 33 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
3

Total granted

$18M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HARVESTING IN SPANISH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +46% · 50% of their budget
  • MC
    MATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +6% · 60% of their budget
  • HO
    HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • KA
    KIDS ACROSS AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
2
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
3
Faith Hope and Love Christian Ministries

Faith Hope and Love Christian Ministries exist to glorify God by proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ, nurturing spiritual growth, strengthening families, and serving our community with faith, hope, and love.

Religion
4
The Christian Home for Children Inc

Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…

—
5
Real Love Ministries International

RLMI is organized exclusively for charitable purposes. Our Mission is to minister to the Haitian people beginning in the village of Laffiteau seeking to share the love of Jesus with each individual and discipling those who know Jesus as…

Religion
6
Do Right Chrisitian Center

Our mission at Do Right Christian Church is to transform lives and communities

Religion
7
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
8
Stories Made New

A residential home of discipleship ministry and personal development for young women ages 18-40.To bring single women who are struggling into fulfillment and purpose in Jesus Christ.To help them deal with and work through life dominating…

Religion
9
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
10
Abbas House
Philanthropy
11
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
12
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is MyLIFEspeaks; the most unlike its peers is Tierce Green Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVESTING IN SPANISH: $3,037,340 · InternationalHARVESTING IN SPANISHMATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $2,197,000 · InternationalMATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME INCmyLIFEspeaks: $510,000 · InternationalmyLIFEspeaksDAYSPRING INTERNATIONAL: $815,000 · OtherDAYSPRING INTERNATIONALLifeHouse of Houston Inc: $699,000 · OtherLifeHouse of Houston IncTODAY THE BIBLE & YOU: $630,000 · OtherTODAY THE BIBLE & YOUTHE REFUGE FOR DMST: $610,000 · OtherTHE REFUGE FOR DMSTPRESTONWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $410,000 · OtherPRESTONWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHCRU INNER CITY: $357,520 · OtherCRU INNER CITYCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $292,260 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTPRESTONWOOD CARING PEOPLE NETWORK: $290,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD INDIA: $276,400 · OtherHIGHER EXPECTATIONS CHURCH: $275,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $200,000 · Other+8 more: $593,000 · Other+8 moreHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY: $1,348,000 · Human ServicesHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATI…FAMILIES OF FANA-WNY INC: $1,242,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES OF FANA-WNY IN…SERVENOW: $570,000 · Human ServicesSERVENOWBETHELS PLACE: $330,000 · Human ServicesBETHELS PLACEBETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $215,400 · Human ServicesBETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIA…+2 more: $110,000 · Human ServicesDAVID STOCKWELL EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $1,175,000 · ReligionDAVID STOCKWELL E…BIBLICA INC: $880,000 · ReligionBIBLICA INCREDEEMED WOMEN: $595,000 · ReligionREDEEMED WOMENTIERCE GREEN MINISTRIES INC: $210,000 · ReligionTIERCE GREEN MINI…+1 more: $50,000 · ReligionBETHELS HEAVENLY HANDS: $335,000 · Food & NutritionAgape Development Ministries: $200,000 · EducationTRANSFORMATION OUTREACH CENTER CDC: $120,000 · Education
International$5,744,340Other$5,448,180Human Services$3,815,900Religion$2,910,000Food & Nutrition$335,000Education$320,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARVESTING IN SPANISH: $3,037,340 over 9y, 50% of budgetMATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $2,197,000 over 9y, 60% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY: $1,348,000 over 9y, 32% of budgetFAMILIES OF FANA-WNY INC: $1,242,500 over 9y, 56% of budgetDAVID STOCKWELL EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $1,175,000 over 9y, 37% of budgetBIBLICA INC: $880,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetLifeHouse of Houston Inc: $699,000 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST: $610,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetREDEEMED WOMEN: $595,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetSERVENOW: $570,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetmyLIFEspeaks: $510,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetBETHELS HEAVENLY HANDS: $335,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetBETHELS PLACE: $330,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetBETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $215,400 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetTIERCE GREEN MINISTRIES INC: $210,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetAgape Development Ministries: $200,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTRANSFORMATION OUTREACH CENTER CDC: $120,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetLOVE HEALS YOUTH: $115,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetANGEL REACH: $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLove Fosters Hope: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARVESTING IN SPANISH ↗
  • Who funds MATAMOROS CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES OF FANA-WNY INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID STOCKWELL EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LifeHouse of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST ↗
  • Who funds REDEEMED WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds SERVENOW ↗
  • Who funds myLIFEspeaks ↗
  • Who funds BETHELS HEAVENLY HANDS ↗
  • Who funds BETHELS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BETHELS FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TIERCE GREEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Agape Development Ministries ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION OUTREACH CENTER CDC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE HEALS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL REACH ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Love Fosters Hope ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO22.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Perry Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Perry Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perry Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph