Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perry and Madeline Garver Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$133kHuman Services$47kArts & Culture$34kInternational$24kAnimals$10kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$3kOther$53k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$254k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEREA COLLEGE$21,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$5,000
COMMUNITY SERVINGS$3,500
THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER$2,500
UNION CAPITAL BOSTON$2,500
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$2,500
ROOT DIVISION LATINO TEACHING ARTIST FELLOWSHIP$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $4k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $4k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $4k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $4k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $2k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $1k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $1k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $3k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $2k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$306k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$306k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+719%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureAnimalsInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEREA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +50%
  • RD
    Root Division
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +8%
  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • G
    GOFUNDMEORGgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +719%
  • BA
    BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +10%
  • SH
    SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
7
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
10
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEREA COLLEGE — $133,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGETHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $28,500 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WE…THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC — $21,000 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT LEARN…+3 more — $3,000 · Other+3 moreUNION CAPITAL INC — $24,000 · Human ServicesUNION CAPITAL INCCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVING…Root Division — $33,500 · Arts & CultureRoot Divisio…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $23,500 · InternationalNEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $10,000 · AnimalsSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $9,000 · HealthGOFUNDMEORG — $3,000 · Philanthropy
Education$133,000Other$52,500Human Services$47,000Arts & Culture$33,500International$23,500Animals$10,000Health$9,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEREA COLLEGE — $133,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRoot Division — $33,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $28,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNION CAPITAL INC — $24,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC — $21,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE
  • Who funds Root Division
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds UNION CAPITAL INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC
  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perry and Madeline Garver Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • The Immigrant Learning Center Inc34% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc12% of income from government
  • Boston Architectural College1% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Perry and Madeline Garver Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Perry and Madeline Garver Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph