Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perley Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$897kFood & Nutrition$278kEducation$6kHuman Services$5kEnvironment$4kScience & Tech$2kRecreation & Sports$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$125,258
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Strongwater Farm$125,258
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $100 → 8%NuPath: $4k → 8%NuPath: $2k → 8%NuPath: $700 → 8%NuPath: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+66%

Still filing today

47%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NUPATH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +47%
  • CT
    COMMUNITY THERAPEUTIC DAY SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +39%
  • FF
    FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA of Greater Lawrence
    one grant, 2017 · $800
  • FF
    Foundation for Cultivating Change
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • PS
    Penn State University
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Aquarium Corporation and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Strongwater Farm — $1,165,759 · OtherStrongwater Farm+17 more — $13,300 · OtherNUPATH INC — $7,200 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,250 · EducationCOMMUNITY THERAPEUTIC DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,300 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $250 · EducationMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $1,600 · Arts & CultureBARTLETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 · Arts & CultureFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS — $1,250 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $750 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $250 · Recreation & SportsAppalachian Mountain Club — $350 · EnvironmentNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC — $250 · Environment
Other$1,179,059Human Services$7,300Education$3,800Arts & Culture$2,100Health$1,250Recreation & Sports$1,000Environment$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNUPATH INC — $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY THERAPEUTIC DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARTLETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NUPATH INC
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
  • Who funds COMMUNITY THERAPEUTIC DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds BARTLETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perley Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Nupath Inc84% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation12% of income from government
  • Federation for Children Wspecial Needs10% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc3% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph