Skip to content
Peoria Diamond Club at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Peoria Diamond Club

The PEORIA DIAMOND CLUB is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting community programs that educate and enrigh children's lives, while enhancing their futures.

$197k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$149kEducation$56kHuman Services$55kRecreation & Sports$15kFood & Nutrition$12kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $78,097, the rows itemized in this filing. The $197,468 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $119,371 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$6,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAY PEORIA$64,997
PEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,600
VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BILLY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $7k → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $12k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 5 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$325k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25’26
Human ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BILLY'S PLACE INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +719%
  • MC
    Mighty Change of Heart
    2× · 2024–2025 · $18k · revenue +35%
  • AB
    ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SB
    SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • HP
    HART PANTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +4%
  • H
    Heartsy
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
2
Az Hugs
Human Services
3
Laced With Love

To provide resources to children in AZ DCS Custody

Human Services
4
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
5
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
6
El Paso Guidance Center Inc dba El Paso Child Guidance Center

Improving the health and well-being of children and families in a safe environment through mental health services, education and awareness.

—
7
Free Arts for Abused Children of Arizona

Free arts for abused children of arizona (free arts) is a nonprofit organization that transforms children's trauma to resilience through the arts. since 1993, free arts has served more than 155,400 children in maricopa county in arizona.…

Crime & Legal
8
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
9
Childsafe Colorado Inc

Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…

Crime & Legal
10
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
11
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
12
Horizon Health and Wellness Inc

Horizon health and wellness inc's mission is to provide strength-based, culturally sensitive integrated health services by partnering with families and individuals to manage challenges and support their recovery. hhw developed an (cont'd…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mighty Change of Heart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLAY PEORIA INC: $209,479 · OtherPLAY PEORIA INCPEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $62,363 · OtherPEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherBILLY'S PLACE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBILLY'S PLA…SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $11,761 · Human ServicesSOLDIERS BE…Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $6,500 · Human ServicesValley of t…Mighty Change of Heart: $17,931 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSTREETLIGHTUSA: $5,000 · Crime & LegalHART PANTRY: $6,500 · Food & NutritionHeartsy: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$291,842Human Services$38,261Youth Development$17,931Crime & Legal$10,000Food & Nutrition$6,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBILLY'S PLACE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetMighty Change of Heart: $17,931 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $11,761 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHART PANTRY: $6,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…American Express Foun…John F Long Foundatio…Thunderbirds CharitiesThe Albertsons Compan…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Thunderbirds Charities · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peoria Diamond Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peoria Diamond Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peoria Diamond Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home