Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pennsylvania Vision Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MEducation$108kRecreation & Sports$2kInternational$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $165k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISION BENEFITS OF AMERICA INC$164,792
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION$12,500
Drexel University Office of Institutional Advancement$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $2k → 13%VISIONCORPS: $15k → 9%VISION CORPS: $12k → 9%VisionCorps: $10k → 9%VISIONCORPS: $9k → 9%VISIONCORPS: $3k → 9%VISION CORPS: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

75%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $93k · revenue +26%
  • SU
    SALUS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $80k · revenue +15%
  • V
    VISIONCORPS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • CP
    CENTRAL PENN 1881
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
  • VR
    Vision Resource Center of Berks County
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nuvisions Center

Nuvisions center is a non-profit corporation, organized under the laws of the state of pennsylvania, to improve the lives of persons with vision, physical or mental impairment through services and employment as well as educate the public…

Employment
2
North Central Sight Services Inc

Create sustainable, person-centered programs, and employment that enhance independence for individuals with unique visual capabilities. we foster positive change, awareness, and advocacy while removing barriers.

Human Services
3
Visability

Provide innovative training and tools for people who are blind or visually impaired to help them achieve their goals and dreams

Human Services
4
Pennsylvania Vision Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Pennsylvania Association for the Blind

To prevent unnecessary blindness and promoting the physical, social and economic self-sufficiency for the commonwealth's blind and visually impaired population. the association functions as an executive office for a network of 26 member…

6
Sights for Hope

Sights for hope empowers people in pennsylvania's lehigh valley and monroe county to succeed no matter how they see the world.sights for hope provides adaptive skills training for individuals who are blind or living with vision loss to…

Human Services
7
Center for Blind & Visually Impaired

Assists and teaches the visually impaired community of delaware county to live safely and independently in their homes and community. the organization provides services to those with reduced vision in delaware and chester counties by…

Human Services
8
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
9
Envision Vision Rehabilitation Center Inc

To improve the quality of life and provide inspiration and opportunity for people who are blind and visually impaired through employment, outreach, rehabilitation, education, and research.to improve the quality of life and provide…

Health
10
Cleveland Society for the Blind

To provide individualized support and tools to navigate the visual world.

Human Services
11
Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired

Vista Center enables individuals who are blind or visually impaired to achieve their highest potential through evaluation, counseling, education and training which promotes independence and improves quality of life.

Health
12
Visioncorps Foundation

Supporting opportunities that enable greater personal & economic independence for people who are blind or vision impaired.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vision Resources of Central Pennsylvania and the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Vision Benefits of America Inc — $1,044,968 · OtherVision Benefits of America IncSALUS UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · OtherSALUS UNIVERSITY+11 more — $115,676 · Other+11 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $92,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S…VISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $31,500 · HealthVISION RES…CENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $7,100 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · HealthVISIONCORPS — $51,985 · Human Services+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education
Other$1,240,644Health$133,600Human Services$53,485Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVision Benefits of America Inc — $1,044,968 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $92,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSALUS UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISIONCORPS — $51,985 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $31,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $7,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUMBERLAND COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES — $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Vision Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pennsylvania Vision Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Vision Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph