· Public charity
Pennsylvania Humanities Council
We put the humanities in action to create positive change in our lives and communities.
Read this first · the figures below need context
69% of Pennsylvania Humanities Council’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Wayne County Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Pennsylvania Humanities Council named its own grantees at scale: 27 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $1,252,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,332,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $193k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ujamaa Collective | $55,000 |
| Rainbow Serpent Inc | $55,000 |
| Community Theater Project Corporation dba Kelly St | $50,000 |
| The Cooperage Project | $50,000 |
| Adams County Arts Council | $50,000 |
| Community Partnerships RC&D | $50,000 |
| Susquehanna Valley Mediation | $50,000 |
| Washington County Historical Society | $50,000 |
| Chester Cultural Arts and Technology Center | $50,000 |
| Wyoming County Cultural Center Inc | $50,000 |
| Crawford County Historical Society | $50,000 |
| The Legacy Arts Project | $50,000 |
| Shamokin-Coal Township Public Library | $50,000 |
| Jefferson County Historical Society | $50,000 |
| Twelve Gates Arts | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Pennsylvania Humanities Council’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWYOMING COUNTY CULTURAL CENTER4× · 2020–2024 · $124k · revenue +38%
- 3D3 DOTS DOWNTOWN4× · 2020–2024 · $123k · revenue +446%
- ACADAMS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL3× · 2022–2024 · $116k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- LPLEADERSHIP PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -19%
- COCOMMISSIONERS OF WYOMING COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $25k
- COCITY OF CARBONDALEone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.
The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…
To provide educational, informational, cultural, and recreational services to the public. services are provided in bethlehem, pennsylvania and its supporting communities.
The library exists to provide free public library services for the needs of the residents of jersey shore and surrounding areas.
Public lending library
Public lending library
The purpose of the penn area library is to select, make available, and maintain resources in a variety of formats, meeting the educational, informational, and recreational needs of our community. the penn area library offers this service…
To ensure the preservation and transmission of society's knowledge, history and culture, and to provide the people of Millvale with free and open access to information for education, recreation and reference.
Public lending library
Provides free library services to residents of pike county, pennsylvania
The shippensburg public library exists to provide cultural vitality and lifelong learning through open access to reading, reference, programs, and community space.
Public lending library
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dauphin County Library System and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Social Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds 3 DOTS DOWNTOWN ↗
- Who funds SHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF HARRISBURG ↗
- Who funds TWELVE GATES ARTS ↗
- Who funds CHESTER CULTURAL ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW SERPENT INC ↗
- Who funds UJAMAA COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY MEDIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ROAD HERITAGE CORRIDOR ↗
- Who funds THE COOPERAGE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONES ORAL HISTORIES ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION ALLIANCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds KNOXVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND HAMILTON LIBRARY ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Indigenous Peoples Day Philly Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SUSQUEHANNA GREENWAY PARTNERSHP ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds BF Jones Memorial Library ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WARREN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services ↗
- Who funds HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP AND SELLERS MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The University of the Arts · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Independence Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Pew Charitable Trusts · The Pittsburgh Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Humanities Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.