Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pennsylvania Dental Foundation

To enhance health by providing grants for sustainable programs in education, access to care, and assistance for pennsylvania dentists and their families in need.

$965k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$965k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEducation$6kHuman Services$5kInternational$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$965,306
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION DBA MOM-N-PA$965,306
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MOM-N-PA: $20k → 8%PA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH: $1k → 10%MOM-N-PA: $20k → 8%PA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH: $1k → 10%MOM-N-PA: $15k → 8%PA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH: $1k → 10%MOM-N-PA: $15k → 12%MOM-N-PA: $15k → 8%MOM-N-PA: $15k → 8%MOM-N-PA: $13k → 8%MOM-N-PA: $12k → 8%MOM-N-PA: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$251k · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$251k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $965k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +121% · 27% of their budget
  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE PA MEDICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $91k
  • HD
    HEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • PH
    PHYSICIANS' HEALTH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • PH
    PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • LF
    LDA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Dental Access Days Foundation

At the gdad foundation, we believe that everyone deserves access to quality dental care and education, regardless of their circumstances. dental health is a critical component of overall well-being, and our mission is to provide charitable…

Health
2
Mission Dental Virginia Inc
Health
3
Volunteer for Dental

Volunteer for dental provides access to dental care for underserved adults in exchange for community service and oral health education.

Health
4
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
5
Miami County Dental Clinic

Provide quality dental care and oral health education in a safe, compassionate, and accessible environment serving low-income, uninsured, under-insured, and medicaid populations of miami county.

Health
6
Appalachian Highlands Community Dental Charities

The mission of appalachian highlands community dental charities is to support organizations providing comprehensive dental services to underserved and uninsured patients. oral care is healthcare. we must ensure our region has adequate…

Health
7
Oral Health International Foundation
—
8
Mainely Teeth Llc

Providing Dental services to low-income individuals who are uninsured,underinsured, or have other significant financial barriers to accessing care.

—
9
Oral Healthcare for All Foundations
—
10
Sunset Park Health Council Inc

The mission of the family health centers at nyu langone is to improve the overall health of the communities it serves by delivering high quality, culturally-competent primary car, and related services within community-based settings.

Health
11
Chespenn Health Services Inc

To provide comprehensive primary and preventive care and social services to medically underserved families and individuals regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthlink Dental Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Academy of Pediatrics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION DBA MOM-N-PA: $965,306 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION DBA MOM-N-PAFOUNDATION OF THE PA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $91,460 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE PA MEDICAL SOCIETY+12 more: $93,000 · Other+12 morePENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $135,250 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANI…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC: $11,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $1,000 · HealthGLOBAL LINKS: $5,000 · InternationalHAWAII DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,149,766Human Services$138,250Health$17,000International$5,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $135,250 over 8y, 27% of budgetHEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC: $11,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S DENTAL CLINIC ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL CLINIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pennsylvania Dental Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pennsylvania Dental Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pennsylvania Dental Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Dental Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pennsylvania Dental’s filings →

    More from the funding graph