· Public charity
Pennsylvania Certified Organic
To uphold and advance organic principles and practices through certification, advocacy, and technical support.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $1,564,460 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,765,413 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $200,953 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $214k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NOFA - NEW YORK | $234,958 |
| NOFA - MASS | $154,101 |
| NOFA - VT | $143,838 |
| NOFA - NH | $133,688 |
| BLACK FARMERS INDEX | $118,740 |
| MOFGA CERTIFICATION SERVICES LLC | $103,722 |
| WEST VIRGINIA FOOD & FARM COALITION | $87,589 |
| VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR BIOLOGICAL | $80,658 |
| NOFA - NJ | $79,673 |
| NOFA - CT | $61,587 |
| GLYNWOOD CENTER INC | $60,145 |
| THE RODALE INSTITUTE | $54,824 |
| FOODSHED ALLIANCE | $39,534 |
| MAINE GRAIN ALLIANCE | $37,226 |
| GROW PITTSBURGH | $21,287 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NONORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I2× · 2023–2024 · $335k · revenue +2%
- NONORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE2× · 2023–2024 · $239k · revenue +17% · 33% of their budget
- WVWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $188k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- ASARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $20k
- OIORGANIC INDEPENDENTS LLPone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…
To educate the public about the positive health and environmental benefits of organic food and farming.
To facilitate the developement of sustainable food systems by helping groweres to increase their knowledge of agro-ecosystems management and utilization of local and regional marketing strategies.
The Alliance for Food and Farming delivers credible information to consumers about the safety of fruits and vegetables.
Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…
To improve the health of the environment and communities by advancing organic regenerative agriculture to grow ecological resilience, economic viability and socially just futures for kentucky farmers through educational, technical and…
To promote, manage, and oversee grazing outreach and education programs in Vermont.
The adams county farmers market association is committed to building vibrant farmers' markets which support small-scale producers, enhance the communities we serve, assist families with access to fresh nutritious food and educate the…
Education regarding organic agriculture
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Organic Farming Assoc of Ny I and the most unlike its peers is West Virginia University Research Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION MA CHAPTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF VERMONT ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds West Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR BIOLOGICAL FARMING INC ↗
- Who funds Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK FARMERS INDEX ↗
- Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
- Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOODSHED ALLIANCE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MAINE GRAIN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GROW PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds West Virginia Farmers Market Association Inc ↗
- Who funds VERMONT MAPLE SUGAR MAKERS ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERVALE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds East End Food Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Farm Aid Inc · Pennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture · Earth Island Institute Inc · American Farmland Trust · Patagoniaorg · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Certified Organic funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
- Intervale Center Inc — 13% of income from government
- Vermont Maple Sugar Makers Assoc Inc — 7% of income from government
- Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey Inc — 6% of income from government
- Northeast Organic Farming Assoc of Connecticut Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.