Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pelz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$406kReligion$346kArts & Culture$251kHuman Services$33kEducation$29kHealth$28kYouth Development$850International$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$400
Median grant
4
States reached
$832k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH ISREAL NER TAMID$18,681
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP$5,000
CHABAD ON CAMPUS - MILWAUKEE$5,000
JEWISH MUSEUM MILWAUKEE$4,300
CONGREGATION SHALOM$3,365
MIM$500
ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL$500
ROHR CHABAD HOUSE$500
CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM CHABAD$400
STAND UP TO CANCER$400
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$250
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$250
CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION$200
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$180
Individual grant recipient$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $955) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $180 → 17%Jewish Family Services: $175 → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $150 → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $150 → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $150 → 17%HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $150 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
CA
NE
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$581k · 38 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
37

Total granted

$581k
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+53%

Still filing today

37%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +32%
  • GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +16%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $7k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $53k
  • HE
    HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER EDUCATION FD
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • PC
    PELZ CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
2
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
3
Medical Society of Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Health
4
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
5
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
8
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
9
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
10
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
11
Wisconsin Medical Credit Union

Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…

—
12
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER: $184,213 · OtherHOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTERCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL NER TAMID: $113,972 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL NER TAMIDCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM CHABAD INC: $98,200 · OtherCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM CHABAD INCCONGREGATION SHALOM: $60,275 · OtherCONGREGATION SHALOMJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $52,712 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER EDUCATION FD: $40,180 · OtherHOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER EDUCATION FDCongregation Beth Israel: $32,130 · Other+57 more: $118,109 · Other+57 moreMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $357,840 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC+2 more: $750 · PhilanthropyMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $18,400 · Education+3 more: $1,300 · EducationUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $6,985 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $300 · Health+3 more: $650 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $805 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $150 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $750 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $450 · International
Other$699,791Philanthropy$358,590Education$19,700Arts & Culture$9,100Health$7,935Human Services$955Youth Development$750International$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $357,840 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $18,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $6,985 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL MILWAUKEE: $3,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $805 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANN'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR MACC INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milwaukee Jewish Federation IncWI25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Howard Frankenthal Family Foundation Ltd · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pelz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pelz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pelz Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pelz Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pelz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph