Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peggy McGrath Rockefeller Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$459kEnvironment$23kHealth$13kEducation$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kArts & Culture$5kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY$5,000
HAWTHORNE VALLEY FARMSCAPE ECOLOGY PROJECT$3,000
LIVINGSTON PUMPER COMPANY NO 1$2,500
CMH FOUNDATION$2,500
ZION COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LIVINGSTON FREE LIBRARY$1,000
GERMANTOWN LIBRARY$1,000
THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP$1,000
CHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY$1,000
NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $400 → 8%DUTCHESS COUNTY 4-H: $250 → 9%GERMANTOWN HOSE COMPANY: $1k → 11%VO-AG ADVISORY BOARD: $200 → 9%GERMANTOWN HOSE: $1k → 11%GERMANTOWN HOSE COMPANY: $1k → 11%GERMANTOWN HOSE COMPANY #1: $1k → 11%GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $1k → 11%GERMANTOWN HOSE: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $1k → 11%CHURCHTOWN FIRE DEPT: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%CHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 11%GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $1k → 11%HAWTHORNE VALLEY FARMSCAPE ECOLOGY PROJECT: $3k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEG: $150k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEG: $150k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRITY: $150k → 11%COL GR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COL GR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CMH FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COLUMBIA GREENE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ZION COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 11%ZION COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 11%ZION FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 11%ZION COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 11%LIVINGSTON LIBRARY: $1k → 11%OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%ZION FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 11%OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%CHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 11%THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%LIVINGSTON LIBRARY: $1k → 11%CHURCHTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 11%OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%ST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $500 → 11%SOUTHERN COLUMBIA LITTLE LEAGUE: $350 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 15 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$513k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +56%
  • GL
    GERMANTOWN LIBRARY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • TO
    THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CH
    COLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CG
    COLUMBIA GREENE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lincoln Park Conservancy Inc

The primary program of the lincoln park conservancy is to grow a sustainable organic garden.

Arts & Culture
2
Nassau County Farm BureauInc

To work for the betterment of Agriculture and private property rights within Nassau County.

—
3
Colebrook Land Conservancy Inc

Conservation of land

Environment
4
Newburgh Community Land Bank

Established for the purpose of stimulating planning, economic development, and neighborhood revitalization in the city of newburgh, new york.

Community Improvement
5
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Goldston Rural Fire Department

To provide fire protection for the community

Public Safety & Disaster
7
New York Agricultural Land Trust Inc

The mission of the Organization is to conserve working farmland and promote a greater appreciation for the agricultural and forested lands and their associated natural resources that enrich our communities and connect future generations to…

Environment
8
Sustainable Food Alliance Inc

To educate the public about the positive health and environmental benefits of organic food and farming.

Environment
9
The Farmington Vol Fire Department

To provide fire protection and education for the community and its citizens.

—
10
Princeton Land Trust

The princeton land trust was formed to preserve the natural beauty and rural character of the town of princeton.

—
11
West Colebrook Farm Company
Arts & Culture
12
Ccof Certification Services Llc

Ccof certification services, llc, a wholly owned subsidiary of california certified organic farmers inc., provides a wide array of cost-effective, organic certification programs. ccof certifies farm and livestock operations, processors,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Germantown Library; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT: $450,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRITZION COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $6,000 · OtherZION COMM…GERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $5,000 · OtherGERMANTOW…COL GR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherCOL GR HO…HAWTHORNE VALLEY FARMSCAPE ECOLOGY PROJECT: $3,000 · OtherHAWTHORNE…ZION FOOD PANTRY: $3,000 · OtherZION FOOD…LIVINGSTON FREE LIBRARY: $3,000 · OtherLIVINGSTO…COLUMBIA GREENE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA …UNITED WAY: $2,500 · OtherUNITED WA…CMH FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherCMH FOUND…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherCHURCHTOWN FIRE DEPT: $2,000 · OtherLIVINGSTON LIBRARY: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $2,300 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentLIVINGSTON PUMPER COMPANY 1 INC: $3,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $400 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$450,000Other$44,800Environment$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,500Community Improvement$5,000Health$2,500Food & Nutrition$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT: $450,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGERMANTOWN LIBRARY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIVINGSTON PUMPER COMPANY 1 INC: $3,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds GERMANTOWN LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON PUMPER COMPANY 1 INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHTOWN FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bank of Greene County Charitable FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Hrbt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peggy McGrath Rockefeller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peggy McGrath Rockefeller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peggy McGrath Rockefeller Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peggy McGrath Rockefeller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peggy McGrath Rockefeller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph