Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peggy and Steve Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$77kHealth$65kHuman Services$49kFood & Nutrition$34kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$5kEducation$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$591k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECHO CHURCH$18,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION$10,000
DUO DUO PROJECT$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BVANK$3,500
BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION$3,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$2,500
GREAT ENLIGHTMENT LOTUS SOCIETY NC$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
NTUAA$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $3k → 14%LOPEZ ISLAND HOSPICE & HOME SUPPORT: $1k → 10%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $10k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $10k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $6k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ADOPTION: $4k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 14 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$223k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+34%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    National Council for Adoption
    9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +81%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +73%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +585%
  • UA
    USC ARCADIA HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • SB
    SOUTH BAY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
7
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Sutter Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
11
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usc Arcadia Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Lopez Island Home & Hospice Support. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECHO CHURCH: $49,500 · OtherECHO CHURCHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BVANK: $22,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BVANKGREAT ENLIGHTMENT LOTUS SOCIETY NC: $9,216 · OtherGREAT ENLIGHTMENT LOTUS SOCIETY NCDUO DUO PROJECT: $7,000 · OtherDUO DUO PROJECTHUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · Other+14 more: $21,499 · Other+14 moreNational Council for Adoption: $48,000 · Human ServicesNational Council for Ado…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOO…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $17,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY M…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S …USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL: $2,000 · HealthUSC ARCADIA …+1 more: $701 · HealthBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $24,800 · ReligionBUDDHIST TZ…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $15,800 · EducationUNIVERSITY …NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationNEW HOPE CH…U Channel Foundation: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$114,715Human Services$52,000Health$27,201Religion$24,800Education$24,800Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Council for Adoption: $48,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $24,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $15,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAND OF MEDICINE BUDDHA INC: $3,380 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetU Channel Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOPEZ ISLAND HOME & HOSPICE SUPPORT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $701 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Council for Adoption ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAND OF MEDICINE BUDDHA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds U Channel Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOPEZ ISLAND HOME & HOSPICE SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peggy and Steve Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peggy and Steve Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peggy and Steve Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph