Skip to content

· Public charity

Pec United Charities Inc

Support of charitable causes, general welfare efforts, community improvement projects and other activities of a charitable nature provided by other 501 (c) (3) organizations.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$107kHuman Services$55kEducation$48kFood & Nutrition$18kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $28,123, the rows itemized in this filing. The $309,267 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $281,144 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,353
Median grant
2
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$8,590
JUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL$7,353
COOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$6,295
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC$5,885
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $7k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $6k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $6k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Pec United Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Pec United Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 10 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$212k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+26%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +20%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +30%
  • SJ
    ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +581%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +26%
  • BC
    BLANCO COUNTY 4-H & FFA YOUTH COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
2
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
4
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children

To provide the highest quality care to improve the lives of children with orthopedic and related conditions and specific learning disabilities. texas scottish rite hospital for children focuses on patient care, research and education.

Health
6
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
7
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
8
Texas Children's Global

To lead efforts that advance healthcare equity through innovative collaboration in care, education, and research globally.

Education
9
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
12
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & South Texas; the most unlike its peers is St Judes Ranch for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $32,434 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXASDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $26,759 · OtherDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $26,434 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICACOOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $23,219 · OtherCOOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDJUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $13,158 · OtherJUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATIONST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC: $24,430 · Human ServicesST JUDES RANCH FOR CHIL…FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $19,195 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF FALLEN EL…SJRC TEXAS INC: $10,881 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $23,030 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPIT…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $6,730 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' H…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,885 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,038 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUN…Central Texas Food Bank Inc: $12,273 · Food & NutritionBLANCO COUNTY 4-H & FFA YOUTH COUNCIL: $5,786 · Youth Development
Other$122,004Human Services$54,506Health$35,645Philanthropy$31,038Food & Nutrition$12,273Youth Development$5,786

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $32,434 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,038 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $26,759 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $26,434 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $23,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $19,195 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $12,273 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $10,881 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $6,730 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,885 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCO COUNTY 4-H & FFA YOUTH COUNCIL: $5,786 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pec United Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pec United Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pec United Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pec United Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pec United Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph