Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pec United Charities Inc

Support of charitable causes, general welfare efforts, community improvement projects and other activities of a charitable nature provided by other 501 (c) (3) organizations.

$288k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$107kHuman Services$55kEducation$48kFood & Nutrition$18kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $33,738 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $288,451 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $254,713 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,857
Median grant
1
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,054
COOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$6,236
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS$5,857
JUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL$5,805
BLANCO COUNTY 4H AND FFA YOUTH COUNCIL$5,786
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $7k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $6k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN: $6k → 11%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 7%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Pec United Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Pec United Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 9 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$184k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+26%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +20%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +30%
  • SJ
    ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +581%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
2
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
4
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Cook Children's Home Health

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
11
Texas Children's Health Plan

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
12
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & South Texas and the most unlike its peers is St Judes Ranch for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS — $32,434 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXASMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $26,434 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICADELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $18,169 · OtherDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONCOOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $16,924 · OtherCOOPER DESPAIN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDJUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION — $5,805 · OtherJUNCTION YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATIONST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC — $24,430 · Human ServicesST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDRE…FOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN — $19,195 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECT…SJRC TEXAS INC — $10,881 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $31,038 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNIT…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $23,030 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $6,730 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' …Central Texas Food Bank Inc — $12,273 · Food & NutritionBLANCO COUNTY 4-H & FFA YOUTH COUNCIL — $5,786 · Youth Development
Other$99,766Human Services$54,506Philanthropy$31,038Health$29,760Food & Nutrition$12,273Youth Development$5,786

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS — $32,434 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $31,038 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $26,434 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $23,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF FALLEN ELECTRICAL LINEMAN — $19,195 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $18,169 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $12,273 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC — $10,881 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $6,730 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCO COUNTY 4-H & FFA YOUTH COUNCIL — $5,786 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pec United Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pec United Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pec United Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph