Skip to content
Pearl Colman Foundation Frank Rimerman Co LLP at a glance

· Private foundation

Pearl Colman Foundation Frank Rimerman Co LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Civil Rights$146kPhilanthropy$68kEducation$49kPublic Benefit$40kEnvironment$39kHealth$26kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
$1,800
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL AMERICANS VOTE$20,000
ACCELERATE CHANGE$20,000
COLTURA$10,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE - DAF$10,000
SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND$10,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
FUTURE NOW INSTITUTE STATES PROJECT$10,000
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL$7,000
PROJECT GLIMMER$5,100
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$5,000
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION$5,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION$4,000
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL$3,000
PROJECT GLIMMER$2,045
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 8%PROJECT GLIMMER: $10k → 10%MESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $300 → 23%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%PROJECT GLIMMER: $5k → 10%PROJECT GLIMMER: $5k → 10%PROJECT GLIMMER: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
NM
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 15 repeat orgs$253k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$159k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+18%

Still filing today

80%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHealthEducationInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +28%
  • PG
    PROJECT GLIMMER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +191%
  • SV
    SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND - SV2
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • ML
    MOVEMENT LABS CENTER FOR COMMON GROUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • WA
    WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +36%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
7
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
10
The Alliance for Just Deliberation On Solar Geoengineering Inc

The alliance for just deliberation on solar geoengineering (dsg) is a charitable, scientific and educational organization dedicated to building just and inclusive deliberation about research and potential use of solar geoengineering. solar…

Environment
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flux Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOVEMENT LABS CENTER FOR COMMON GROUND: $30,000 · OtherMOVEMENT LABS CENTER FOR COMMON GROUNDAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL: $27,500 · OtherAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCILNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSCHWAB CHARITABLE - DAF: $10,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE - DAFFUTURE NOW INSTITUTE STATES PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherFUTURE NOW INSTITUTE STATES PROJECTSV2 SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND: $10,000 · OtherSV2 SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUNDSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Other+34 more: $52,913 · Other+34 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEAll Americans Vote: $20,000 · Civil RightsAll Americans VoteACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsACCELERATE CHANGE INCTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTI…ROCK THE VOTE: $10,000 · Civil RightsROCK THE VOTETHE LEADERSHIP CENTER FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STUDIES: $5,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $30,000 · EducationWORKING AME…DONORSCHOOSEORG: $10,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOS…AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationTHE FUTURE NOW INSTITUTE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FUTURE…SILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND - SV2: $20,000 · PhilanthropySILICON VA…+1 more: $52 · PhilanthropyPROJECT GLIMMER: $22,145 · Human ServicesPROJECT G…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FA…+2 more: $400 · Human ServicesCOLTURA: $32,000 · Environment+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentGround Game Fund: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$171,413Civil Rights$95,000Education$42,500Philanthropy$40,052Human Services$37,545Environment$34,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLTURA: $32,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT GLIMMER: $22,145 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUTURE NOW INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAll Americans Vote: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND - SV2: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGround Game Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CENTER FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STUDIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGULF COAST DENTAL OUTREACH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCING GIRLS EDUCATION IN AFRICA INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN PRACTICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlux Foundation: $300 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNeighbors Abroad: $105 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…Tides FoundationThe David and Lucile …New Venture FundMorgan Stanley Global…The San Francisco Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA18.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Tides Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · New Venture Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pearl Colman Foundation Frank Rimerman Co LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pearl Colman Foundation Frank Rimerman Co LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Southern Oregon University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pearl Colman Foundation Frank Rimerman Co LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home