Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peaas Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$181kCommunity Improvement$125kArts & Culture$115kEducation$48kReligion$33kHuman Services$8kHealth$4kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$20,000
BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$10,500
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$7,500
TEMPLE SHALOM$5,000
HEALING 4 HEROES INC$3,500
THE MIRIAM FUND$2,500
JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES$1,800
TEMPLE EMANUEL$1,800
THE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE$1,500
CHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB$1,000
HEBREW CONGREGATION OF CHAUTAUQUA$1,000
CHABAD JEWISH HOUSE OF CHAUTAUQUA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $10k → 8%THE MIRIAM FUND: $3k → 16%THE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $2k → 6%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $60k → 18%UNIV OF MICHICAN: $3k → 14%TEMPLE SHALOM: $5k → 9%HEALING 4 HEROES INC: $4k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $3k → 8%IMPACT ASSET INC GIVING FUND: $125k → 8%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $10k → 8%CHAUTAQUA INSTITUTION: $30k → 18%UNIV OF MICHICAN: $500 → 14%TEMPLE SHALOM: $5k → 9%IMPACT ASSETS INC GIVING FUND: $125k → 8%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $10k → 8%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $20k → 18%UNIV OF MICHICAN: $500 → 14%TEMPLE SHALOM: $4k → 9%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $9k → 8%CHAUTAUQUA OPERA GUILD: $5k → 18%TEMPLE SHALOM: $3k → 9%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $4k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $8k → 8%CHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB: $1k → 18%TEMPLE SHALOM: $2k → 9%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $8k → 8%HEBREW CONGREGATION OF CHAUTAUQUA: $1k → 18%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 8%HEBREW CONGREGATION OF CHAUTAUQUA: $1k → 18%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 8%CHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB: $1k → 18%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SVCS: $2k → 8%CHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB: $800 → 18%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SVCS: $2k → 8%CHABAD JEWISH HOUSE OF CHAUTAUQUA: $500 → 18%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SVCS: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SVCS: $500 → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CT
VA
MD
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 9 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +139% since the first grant, against +94% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$198k
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
+94%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +312%
  • TB
    THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +34%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • IA
    IMPACT ASSETS INC GIVING FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • IA
    IMPACT ASSET INC GIVING FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $125k
  • CO
    CHAUTAUQUA OPERA GUILD
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
2
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Wcuw Inc

Broadcasting, leasing, maintaining and operating noncommercial radio broadcasting facilities to inform, educate and entertain the general public

Arts & Culture
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
9
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Florida Public Media Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPACT ASSETS INC GIVING FUND: $125,000 · OtherIMPACT ASSETS INC GIVING FUNDIMPACT ASSET INC GIVING FUND: $125,000 · OtherIMPACT ASSET INC GIVING FUNDTEMPLE SHALOM: $17,750 · OtherTEMPLE SHALOMTEMPLE EMANUEL: $10,800 · Other+10 more: $28,700 · Other+10 moreCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $110,000 · Arts & CultureCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION+2 more: $300 · Arts & CultureCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $53,500 · PhilanthropyCombined Je…THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $43,000 · EducationTHE BEAVE…HEALING4HEROES: $3,500 · Public BenefitSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $100 · HealthTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 · Animals
Other$307,250Arts & Culture$110,300Philanthropy$53,500Education$43,000Public Benefit$3,500Health$100Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $110,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $53,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $3,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $2,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING4HEROES ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peaas Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peaas Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peaas Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Peaas Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peaas’ filings →

More from the funding graph