Skip to content

· Private foundation

PC and Rosana Hsu Chao Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$764kYouth Development$211kHuman Services$211kPhilanthropy$206kInternational$200kFood & Nutrition$130kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCA$35,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$35,000
ASIAN PACIFIC FUND$35,000
FRIENDLY CENTER$35,000
INNER-CITY ARTS$35,000
HARMONY PROJECT$35,000
PS ARTS$35,000
THE WOODEN FLOOR$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIGHT: $50k → 11%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $35k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $50k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $50k → 14%OCA: $50k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $50k → 9%ALRIGHT: $40k → 11%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $40k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $40k → 14%OCA: $40k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $40k → 9%ALRIGHT: $35k → 11%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $50k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCA: $35k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $35k → 9%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $40k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $35k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $35k → 14%OCA: $35k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $35k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $40k → 14%OCA: $35k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $35k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $35k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $35k → 14%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $35k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $50k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $35k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $40k → 10%FRIENDLY CENTER: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $35k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $35k → 10%FRIENDLY CENTER: $35k → 10%HARMONY PROJECT: $50k → 14%PS ARTS: $50k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $40k → 14%PS ARTS: $40k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $35k → 14%PS ARTS: $35k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $35k → 14%PS ARTS: $35k → 14%LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $35k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $35k → 14%PS ARTS: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 11 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$2.0M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-6%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FRIENDLY CENTER INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $246k · revenue +42%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    6× · 2021–2026 · $226k · revenue +71%
  • PA
    PS ARTS
    6× · 2021–2026 · $226k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • A
    ALIGHT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Alliance for Children's Rights

The alliance has improved the lives of more than 178,000 young clients with stability through adoption and legal guardianship, and with access to healthcare, education, and other critical supports, serving over 5,600 children and young…

Unclassified
3
Epacenter

Epacenter's mission is to increase opportunities for youth to discover and amplify their talents, realize their potential, and impact the world through art, design, and technology.

Arts & Culture
4
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
5
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
6
Changing Worlds

Changing worlds' mission is to foster inclusive communities through oral history, writing and arts programs that improve student learning, affirm identity and enhance cross-cultural understanding.

Civil Rights
7
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
8
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
9
Angels Gate Cultural Center Inc

To provide space for artists to work and to engage community through arts education, exhibitions of contemporary art, and cultural events.

Arts & Culture
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Great Public Schools Now

The organization invests in schools, organizations and initiatives that catalyze excellence in public education, convenes leaders and uplifts public understanding to advocate for great public schools.

Education
12
California Children's Academy

Cca is committed to preparing young children to be global citizens who are developmentally well-rounded, emotionally literate, and environmentally conscious.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wooden Floor for Youth Movement; the most unlike its peers is Los Angeles Regional Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDLY CENTER INC: $246,000 · OtherFRIENDLY CENTER INCA PLACE CALLED HOME: $246,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEOCA: $226,000 · OtherOCAPS ARTS: $226,000 · OtherPS ARTSALRIGHT: $100,000 · OtherALRIGHTSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $65,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $65,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $226,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR Y…INNER-CITY ARTS: $226,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $241,000 · PhilanthropyASIAN PACIF…Harmony Project: $226,000 · EducationHarmony Pro…Save The Children Federation Inc: $150,000 · InternationalSave The …ALIGHT: $50,000 · InternationalALIGHT
Other$1,174,000Arts & Culture$452,000Philanthropy$241,000Education$226,000International$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $246,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $246,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $241,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHarmony Project: $226,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $226,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetPS ARTS: $226,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $226,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDLY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds PS ARTS ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PC and Rosana Hsu Chao Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PC and Rosana Hsu Chao Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PC and Rosana Hsu Chao’s filings →

More from the funding graph