Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

PC and Rosana Hsu Chao Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$764kYouth Development$211kHuman Services$211kPhilanthropy$206kInternational$200kFood & Nutrition$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INNER-CITY ARTS$35,000
PS ARTS$35,000
FRIENDLY CENTER$35,000
ASIAN PACIFIC FUND$35,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$35,000
HARMONY PROJECT$35,000
OCA$35,000
THE WOODEN FLOOR$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIGHT: $50k → 11%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $35k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $50k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $50k → 14%OCA: $50k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $50k → 9%ALRIGHT: $40k → 11%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $40k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $40k → 14%OCA: $40k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $40k → 9%ALRIGHT: $35k → 11%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $50k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCA: $35k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $35k → 9%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $40k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $35k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $35k → 14%OCA: $35k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $35k → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $31k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $40k → 14%OCA: $31k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $35k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $35k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $31k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $35k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $50k → 10%A PLACE CALLED HOME: $31k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $40k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $35k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $35k → 10%FRIENDLY CENTER: $35k → 10%INNER-CITY ARTS: $31k → 14%FRIENDLY CENTER: $31k → 10%HARMONY PROJECT: $50k → 14%PS ARTS: $50k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $40k → 14%PS ARTS: $40k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $35k → 14%PS ARTS: $35k → 14%LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $35k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $35k → 14%PS ARTS: $35k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $31k → 14%PS ARTS: $31k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 11 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-6%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FRIENDLY CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $211k · revenue +42%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    5× · 2021–2025 · $191k · revenue +71%
  • IA
    INNER-CITY ARTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $191k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • A
    ALIGHT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Epacenter

Epacenter's mission is to increase opportunities for youth to discover and amplify their talents, realize their potential, and impact the world through art, design, and technology.

Arts & Culture
3
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
4
Los Angeles Universal Preschool

Child360 works to improve the quality of early learning and give children the best start in school and life. its mission is to strengthen education programs, nurture family engagement, grow a qualified workforce and advance public policy…

5
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
6
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
7
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
8
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
9
Renaissance Arts Academy

Tk-12 charter public school focused on educational equity and success for all students with a priority on tradionally underserved populations.

Education
10
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
11
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
12
La Scuola International School

Inspire brave learners to shape the future.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wooden Floor for Youth Movement and the most unlike its peers is Alight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDLY CENTER INC — $211,000 · OtherFRIENDLY CENTER INCA PLACE CALLED HOME — $211,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEOCA — $191,000 · OtherOCAPS ARTS — $191,000 · OtherPS ARTSALRIGHT — $100,000 · OtherALRIGHTLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $65,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $65,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKINNER-CITY ARTS — $191,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT — $191,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR …ASIAN PACIFIC FUND — $206,000 · PhilanthropyASIAN PACIF…Save The Children Federation Inc — $150,000 · InternationalSave The Ch…ALIGHT — $50,000 · InternationalALIGHTHarmony Project — $191,000 · EducationHarmony Pr…
Other$1,034,000Arts & Culture$382,000Philanthropy$206,000International$200,000Education$191,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC — $211,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $211,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND — $206,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHarmony Project — $191,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS — $191,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT — $191,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPS ARTS — $191,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDLY CENTER INC
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME
  • Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC FUND
  • Who funds Harmony Project
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT
  • Who funds PS ARTS
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ALIGHT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization PC and Rosana Hsu Chao Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph