Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul L Smith Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$13kHealth$12kEducation$12kReligion$5kCivil Rights$3kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$482
Median grant
3
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAUL SMITH LIBRARY$1,766
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION OF YORK$949
VETERAN'S HELPING HAND INC$949
PRESSLEY RIDGE$949
SALEM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$883
SALVATION ARMY OF YORK COUNTY$883
PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST$482
YORK LITERACY COUNCIL$482
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$482
WOMEN S CARE CENTER$482
YORK BENEVOLENT ASSN$482
MENTAL HEALTH ASSN$482
LIFE PATH MINISTRIES$482
NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS$482
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $546 → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $496 → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $482 → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $476 → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $472 → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $467 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$50k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-45%

Still filing today

38%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PRESSLEY RIDGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +4%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +62%
  • YB
    YORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • PC
    PA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC
    one grant, 2020 · $665
  • VF
    VISIONCORPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $616 · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
2
Wesley Retirement Services Inc

Guided by christian compassion, wesleylife supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home. as a non-profit organization, we understand our responsibility and obligation to operate with…

Human Services
3
Nysarc Inc - Warren Washington & Albany Counties Chapter

The organization's mission is to provide services, advocate for and offer opportunities to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families, enabling them to realize their full potential in our communities.

—
4
Wesley Community Services Inc

Wesley community services, inc. is focused on providing services to older adults and those of low income. it was established in 2005 as a faith-based non-profit organization dedicated to providing services to people of all faiths in a…

Human Services
5
Visiting Nurse Association of Southeastern Connecticut Inc

To provide and administer a comprehensive multidisciplinary, therapeutic and public health nursing program primarily to residents of the southeastern connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
New York Road Runners Inc

As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.

—
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
8
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
9
Nysarc Inc Rensselaer County Chapter

The arc of rensselaer county is committed to advocating for the rights and safety of individuals of all ages who primarily have intellectual disabilities and, in some instances, have other developmental disabilities or delays. the arc is a…

Human Services
10
Nysarc Inc Herkimer County Chapter D/B/a Arc Herkimer

We envision arc herkimer as the premier service provider and resource for people with disabilities, and others in our community partnership of caring people committed to excellence, united by values and goals, directed toward unprecedented…

—
11
Jevs Hireability

Jevs hireability offers an empowering, customized employment program to assist individuals living with a disability or chronic disease by preparing them for competitive employment and community integration.

—
12
Ascentria Care Alliance Inc

We are called to strengthen communities by empowering people to respond to life's challenges.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York Union Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Veteran's Helping Hand Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAUL SMITH LIBRARY: $9,045 · OtherPAUL SMITH LIBRARYSALVATION ARMY OF YORK COUNTY: $4,899 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF YORK COUNTYSALEM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $4,523 · OtherSALEM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTARTHRITIS FOUNDATION OF YORK: $3,553 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATION OF YORKPRESSLEY RIDGE: $3,309 · OtherPRESSLEY RIDGEMENTAL HEALTH ASSN: $2,940 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSNYORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $2,889 · OtherYORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATIONYORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL: $2,744 · OtherYORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCILPENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST: $2,467 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,308 · OtherHOFFMAN HOME FOR YOUTH: $1,940 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1,829 · Other+7 more: $4,553 · Other+7 moreNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $2,939 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,468 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $373 · HealthYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,509 · Housing & ShelterVETERAN'S HELPING HAND INC: $949 · Public Benefit
Other$46,999Human Services$2,939Health$2,841Housing & Shelter$1,509Public Benefit$949

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESSLEY RIDGE: $3,309 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $2,939 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $2,889 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL: $2,744 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,468 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,509 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISIONCORPS FOUNDATION: $616 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $373 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESSLEY RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERAN'S HELPING HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIONCORPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bruce R & Madelyn G Snyder FoundationPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bruce R & Madelyn G Snyder Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · York County Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul L Smith Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul L Smith Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul L Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph