Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$93kEducation$75kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$92k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary$20,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Palm Beach Co Fishing Foundation$2,000
Armed Forces Shootout$1,500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Salvation Army$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Wounded Veterans Relief Fund: $1k → 11%Wounded Veterans Relief Fund: $1k → 11%Wounded Veterans Relief Fund: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$146k · 7 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$146k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+30%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    McCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $88k · revenue -8%
  • WU
    WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +208%
  • PB
    Palm Beach Co Fishing Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k

Funded once

  • TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +30%
  • KS
    KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +182%
  • WU
    Washburn University
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
2
University Foundation
—
3
The Kansas University Endowment Association

KU Endowment partners with donors in providing philanthropic support to build a greater University of Kansas.

Education
4
Washburn University of Topeka Trust
Philanthropy
5
Kennesaw State University Research and Service Foundation Inc

The mission of ksurf is to serve ksu as a cooperative organization in order to promote research and the development of intellectual property for the university.

Education
6
Washburn University Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of wu alumni and friends, the mission of the washburn university charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable…

Education
7
Kansas State University Foundation

The mission of the kansas state university foundation is to secure and prudently manage private gifts in support of kansas state university and foster a culture that unites philanthropic desires with university priorities.

Education
8
Collegiate Foundations
Philanthropy
9
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
10
Command and General Staff College Foundation Inc

The cgsc foundation supports the united states army command and general staff college in educating leaders for the 21st century in the following six mission areas: enrich the college's academic environment; foster a strong relationship…

Education
11
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
12
Washington Federal Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kappa Sigma Endowment Fund; the most unlike its peers is Armed Forces Shootout Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

McCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary Inc: $88,000 · AnimalsMcCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary IncWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,000 · EducationWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITYPalm Beach Co Fishing Foundation: $5,000 · OtherPalm Beach…Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual…Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual…KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND: $2,000 · OtherKAPPA SIGM…St Clare School: $1,900 · OtherSt Clare S…Midland Care Hospice: $1,500 · OtherMidland Ca…+5 more: $2,100 · Other+5 moreWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesARMED FORCES SHOOTOUT CORP: $1,500 · Public BenefitKansas State Historical Society Inc: $600 · Arts & Culture
Animals$88,000Education$71,000Other$17,500Human Services$2,500Public Benefit$1,500Arts & Culture$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMcCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary Inc: $88,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKansas State Historical Society Inc: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOPEKA HIGH SCHOOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds McCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds ARMED FORCES SHOOTOUT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Kansas State Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOPEKA HIGH SCHOOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph