Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul and Sherri Reddick Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$60kInternational$15kCivil Rights$15kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$5kCrime & Legal$5kHousing & Shelter$5kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$445k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY INC$5,000
MEDIATION CENTER OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE INC$5,000
LOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER SAVANNAH INC$5,000
CHATHAM SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY$5,000
THE SAVANNAH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$2,800
URBAN MENTORING ACADEMY OF SAVANNAH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 9%MEDIATION CENTER OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE INC: $5k → 16%CHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL: $50k → 23%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND USA: $10k → 17%LOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC: $5k → 16%THE SAVANNAH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION MICKVE ISRAEL: $10k → 16%CHATHAM SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY: $5k → 16%BRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY INC: $5k → 16%CHATHAM SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY: $5k → 16%URBAN MENTORING ACADEMY OF SAVANNAH: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
2
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
3
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
5
The Ljd Jewish Family & Community Services Inc

The mission of the ljd jewish family & community services, inc. is to strengthen the entire community by providing family and individual social services in the jewish tradition of helping people help themselves.

Human Services
6
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
7
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
8
Collaborative Solutions for Communities

To be the leading solution-focused resource in building strong, sustainable families and communities through family support services, innovative training, community capacity building, economic development and social enterprise.

Crime & Legal
9
Child & Family Services of Eastern Va Inc D/B/a the Up Center

The up center has provided a safety net for the hampton roads community for 142 years. presently, we impact approximately 10,000 people each year. our mission is to partner with children, families, and communities to improve lives and…

Human Services
10
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
11
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
12
Families First of Palm Beach County Foundation Inc

To cultivate financial resources dedicated to building stronger families and stronger communities through the operations and programs of families first. contributing to the foundation is an investment in a safe, healthy and sustainable…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham-Savannah Citizen Advocacy; the most unlike its peers is Loop It Up Savannah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL: $50,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPALTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCONGREGATION MICKVE ISRAEL: $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MICKVE ISRAELTHE SAVANNAH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherCHATHAM-SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY: $10,000 · Civil RightsCHATHAM-SAVANN…BRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND FAMILIY ADVOCACY INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsBRIGHTSIDE CHI…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …THE MEDIATION CENTER OF COASTAL EMPIRE INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY PROMISE OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$75,300Civil Rights$15,000International$15,000Crime & Legal$5,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHATHAM-SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND FAMILIY ADVOCACY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MEDIATION CENTER OF COASTAL EMPIRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAVANNAH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Savannah Community Foundation IncGA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · International Paper Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Sherri Reddick Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Sherri Reddick Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul and Sherri Reddick Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Paul and Sherri Reddick Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul and Sherri Reddick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph