Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$199kReligion$91kFood & Nutrition$79kAnimals$49kEducation$48kHousing & Shelter$33kYouth Development$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL$10,500
OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$9,205
OPERA OMAHA$8,000
LAURITZEN GARDENS$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BLUEBARN THEATRE$5,000
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$4,500
METRO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$4,000
COMPLETELY KIDS$3,000
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NE HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE$2,000
SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $3k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
OR
WY
OH
NE
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 30 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
39

Total granted

$488k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-3%

Still filing today

47%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Blue Barn Theatre
    7× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +85%
  • OO
    OPERA OMAHA INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +19%
  • SF
    SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • NF
    NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -75%
  • MC
    METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
3
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
4
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
5
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
6
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
8
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
9
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
10
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
11
Omaha Zoological Society

The omaha zoological society's mission is to inspire, educate, and engage people to serve as life-long stewards for animals, their habitats, and their conservation.

Animals
12
Omaha Theater Company

To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opera Omaha Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
21/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL: $89,200 · OtherFIRST CENTRAL CONGREGATIONALFOOD BANK: $28,000 · OtherFOOD BANKNE HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,250 · OtherNE HUMANE SOCIETYFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $19,000 · OtherOMAHA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherLAURITZEN GARDENS: $13,000 · Other+45 more: $178,701 · Other+45 moreBlue Barn Theatre: $43,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Barn TheatreOPERA OMAHA INC: $41,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAHA INCTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $8,300 · Arts & CultureTHE UNION FOR CONT…+4 more: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $32,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $12,000 · AnimalsSouth Carolina Aquarium: $8,600 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsCOMPLETELY KIDS: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCITY SPROUTS INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementNEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC: $10,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $3,000 · EducationTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · Education
Other$385,151Arts & Culture$98,300Housing & Shelter$33,000Animals$21,100Youth Development$20,000Community Improvement$16,000Education$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlue Barn Theatre: $43,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetOPERA OMAHA INC: $41,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $32,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $12,205 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $8,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $8,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH BRIDGES INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEEP OMAHA BEAUTIFUL INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA AREA YOUTH ORCHESTRAS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BIG GARDEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL UPCOMING STARS IN THE CLASSICS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Blue Barn Theatre ↗
  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FONTENELLE FOREST ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds South Carolina Aquarium ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH BRIDGES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP OMAHA BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA AREA YOUTH ORCHESTRAS ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE43.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · The Claire M Hubbard Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul and Oscar Giger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph