Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul & Cheryl Hamel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$18kHealth$15kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Benefit$3kHuman Services$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION$10,000
GIVING THE GLAM$2,500
BARRINGTON PUBLIC LIB FOUNDATION$1,000
WESTPORT MA FOOD PANTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVING THE GLAM: $10k → 7%GIVING THE GLAM: $3k → 7%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%GIVING THE GLAM: $1k → 7%CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $1k → 15%GIVING THE GLAM: $1k → 7%GIVING THE GLAM: $1k → 7%GIVING THE GLAM: $1k → 7%GIVING THE GLAM: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$48k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+39%

Still filing today

40%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GIVING THE GLAM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +11%
  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue -41%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOUTHERN AZ
    3× · 2020–2023 · $9k

Funded once

  • WI
    WALKER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • MEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
4
Arizona Behavioral Health Corporation

Providing quality, affordable supportive housing for persons with behavioral health needs in maricopa county.

Unclassified
5
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
6
The Home for Little Wanderers Inc

To help vulnerable children and their families build permanent, positive change.

Human Services
7
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
8
Aviva Children's Services

Aviva children's services changes the lives of more than 3,000 children in foster care each year by providing emergency resources, ongoing family support and comprehensive behavioral health services.

Human Services
9
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
10
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
11
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
12
Brockton Area Multi-Services Inc

To empower people and enrich their lives, through compassionate support and diverse services, one individual, one family at a time.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Giving the Glam Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVING THE GLAM INC: $18,400 · Human ServicesGIVING THE GLAM INCCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOUTHERN AZ: $8,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOUTH…RI COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $3,000 · OtherRI COMMUNITY FOOD BANKBARRINGTON PUBLIC LIB FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherBARRINGTON PUBLIC LIB FOU…WESTPORT MA FOOD PANTRY: $1,000 · OtherWESTPORT MA FOOD PANTRY+2 more: $750 · OtherBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOU…WALKER INC: $10,000 · EducationWALKER INCROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterMEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International
Human Services$20,400Other$16,250Health$15,000Education$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIVING THE GLAM INC: $18,400 over 7y, 10% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALKER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul & Cheryl Hamel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul & Cheryl Hamel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Walker Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul & Cheryl Hamel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph