Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
89
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$25MEducation$16MArts & Culture$12MRecreation & Sports$6.1MPhilanthropy$2.7MReligion$2.5MCommunity Improvement$2.3MYouth Development$1.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k38 grants · $768k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+8 grants · $9.9M
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB$5,542,949
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$1,200,000
RISE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ACCELERATE INSTITUTE$775,000
PATHWAYS FOUNDATION$469,163
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$450,000
FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC$255,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$250,000
ALAIN LOCKE CHARTER SCHOOL$150,000
THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$125,000
SAINTS FAITH HOPE & CHARITY$125,000
100 CLUB OF CHICAGO$100,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HAVEY INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH$100,000
RON BURTON TRAINING VILLAGE$100,000
LEO CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $8k → 11%PARTNERS 4 HOPE TANZANIA: $10k → 6%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $1k → 23%CRISIS CENTER INC: $40k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $10k → 15%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $8k → 17%LAKE GENEVA FOOD PANTRY: $20k → 10%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $50k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $5k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $1k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $1k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $6k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%The NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $100k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $100k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $100k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $100k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $50k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $50k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY: $15k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY: $5k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62M · 146 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

146 repeat relationships: 74 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

146
75

Total granted

$62M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

70%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $413k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +31%
  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +67%
  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicago
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SR
    SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB FKA REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • EI
    EMPOWER ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -99%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $899k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
8
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
9
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
10
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Enchanted Backpack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

163 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 163 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
160/163
Grantees still filing
110/163
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $19,330,373 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chic…+16 more: $1,334,881 · Health+16 moreLOYOLA ACADEMY: $2,000,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYRISE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,950,000 · OtherRISE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATIONLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALANN & ROBERT H: $1,130,749 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALANN & …SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB FKA REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,005,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS: $899,337 · OtherTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS: $800,000 · Other+102 more: $12,226,225 · Other+102 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $5,500,000 · EducationBig Shoulders FundUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,350,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du…Accelerate Institute: $2,600,000 · EducationAccelerate InstituteAlain Locke Charter School: $1,050,000 · EducationAlain Locke Charter SchoolEMPOWER ILLINOIS: $1,000,000 · EducationEMPOWER ILLINOISTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $630,800 · Education+23 more: $2,171,930 · Education+23 moreLyric Opera of Chicago: $3,900,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of…CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $2,395,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKES…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,175,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUN…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $625,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY…+17 more: $1,432,000 · Arts & Culture+17 moreFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC: $1,530,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $270,000 · PhilanthropyHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $185,000 · PhilanthropyFOREFRONT: $119,779 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $90,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $101,000 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $1,424,200 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUASH NFP: $125,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more: $170,500 · Recreation & SportsCLEARBROOK: $550,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $175,000 · Human ServicesA Better Chicago: $150,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $40,100 · Human Services+4 more: $79,000 · Human Services
Health$20,665,254Other$20,011,311Education$17,302,730Arts & Culture$9,527,000Philanthropy$2,295,779Recreation & Sports$1,719,700Human Services$1,104,100

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $19,330,373 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $5,500,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,350,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $3,900,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetAccelerate Institute: $2,600,000 over 8y, 43% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $2,395,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetRISE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,950,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC: $1,530,000 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,424,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,175,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetAlain Locke Charter School: $1,050,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetEMPOWER ILLINOIS: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS: $800,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetPathways Foundation: $685,881 over 2y, 25% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $630,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $625,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $550,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $400,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $350,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetThe Cara Program: $300,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $270,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF PRENTICE: $250,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $250,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $250,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $200,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $185,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $185,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $175,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetLINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetGARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Sport Chicago: $166,250 over 1y, 18% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $150,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetA Better Chicago: $150,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $145,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $131,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetERIE ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: $130,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $130,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $125,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CIVIC FEDERATION: $125,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetFOREFRONT: $119,779 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $110,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Accelerate Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds RISE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alain Locke Charter School ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PRENTICE ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Scholl FoundationIL50.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Scholl Foundation · Lavin Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Canning Foundation · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · Carol Bernick Family Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 240 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan’s filings →

More from the funding graph