Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pathways Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.6MYouth Development$2.2MEducation$1.9MHealth$1.0MHousing & Shelter$630kHuman Services$480kCommunity Improvement$375kCivil Rights$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE SHALL READ$300,000
GIRLS GROUP$250,000
FRIENDS OF ACADIA$250,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$250,000
KEEP GROWING DETROIT$150,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$150,000
DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM$150,000
ACLU OF MICHIGAN$125,000
COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES$120,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OAKLAND COUNTY$100,000
BLACK LEADERS DETROIT$100,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$100,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$75,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GLOBAL$75,000
VISTA MARIA$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $440k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICE: $100k → 8%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICE: $60k → 8%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICE: $50k → 8%BASBLUE: $50k → 21%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICE: $50k → 8%ORCHARDS CHILDRENS SERVICE: $50k → 8%BASBLUE: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 23 repeat orgs$380k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$9.5M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +2%
  • WS
    WE SHALL READ
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +148% · 91% of their budget
  • GIRLS GROUP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $875k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Acadia
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • VISTA MARIA
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue 0%
  • OM
    ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
4
The Greening of Detroit

The greening of detroit's mission is the sustainable growth of a healthy urban community through trees, green spaces, healthy living, education, training and job opportunities.

Environment
5
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
6
Diploma Equity Project

The organization works with k-12, higher education and other community partners to design and implement programs to improve rates of college persistence and completion.

Education
7
Endeavor Detroit

Endeavor Detroit is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Michigan and the wider Great Lakes region, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in the…

Community Improvement
8
Challenge Detroit

To retain and attract young leaders from across the nation to the region who have the courage, passion, and drive to make a difference, and to provide them with the opportunity to collaborate and lend their intellectual capital to…

Community Improvement
9
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
10
Detroit Parent Network

To be a champion for parents of children in the community.

Human Services
11
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
12
Friends of the Children - Detroit

Friends of the children - detroit has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keep Growing Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Imagine Los Angeles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $975,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODHabitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc: $300,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of Oakland …CITY YEAR INC: $275,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCACLU OF MICHIGAN: $250,000 · OtherACLU OF MICHIGANHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GLOBAL: $200,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GLOBALEASTERN MARKET PARTNERSHIP: $125,000 · OtherFriends of Acadia: $250,000 · OtherFriends of AcadiaDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $225,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRA…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100,000 · Other+4 more: $157,500 · Other+4 moreGIRLS GROUP: $875,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROUPBRILLIANT DETROIT: $750,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRILLIANT DETROITTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROG…DETROIT HORSE POWER: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $1,350,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INCBig Green: $550,000 · Food & NutritionBig GreenWE SHALL READ: $1,000,000 · EducationWE SHALL READCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $471,094 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE…DETROIT FOOD & ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACADEMY: $325,000 · EducationDETROIT FOOD & ENTRE…KEEP GROWING DETROIT: $570,000 · Community ImprovementORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $310,000 · Human ServicesBASBLUE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesBLACK LEADERS DETROIT: $375,000 · Employment
Other$2,857,500Youth Development$1,950,000Food & Nutrition$1,900,000Education$1,796,094Community Improvement$570,000Human Services$440,000Employment$375,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $1,350,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWE SHALL READ: $1,000,000 over 4y, 91% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $875,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $750,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetKEEP GROWING DETROIT: $570,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetBig Green: $550,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $471,094 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK LEADERS DETROIT: $375,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetDETROIT FOOD & ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACADEMY: $325,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $310,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $275,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $250,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetFriends of Acadia: $250,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $225,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetBASBLUE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $75,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds WE SHALL READ ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds KEEP GROWING DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Big Green ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds BLACK LEADERS DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT FOOD & ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds BASBLUE INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds ON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · DTE Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Kresge Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · McGregor Fund · Flagstar Foundation Inc · United Jewish Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pathways Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pathways Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pathways’ filings →

More from the funding graph