· Private foundation
Pascale Sykes Foundation Inc 5575-00-42
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $239k
- $250k+2 grants · $635k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mercy Center Inc | $328,822 |
| New City Kids | $306,250 |
| Appel Farm Arts & Music Center | $169,250 |
| Parents Anonymous of NJ | $70,000 |
| Temple Vision Corporation | $25,000 |
| Puerto Rican Action Board | $25,000 |
| Council of New Jersey Grantmakers Inc | $25,000 |
| Revive South Jersey | $25,000 |
| Community Foundation of New Jersey | $25,000 |
| HABcore Inc | $22,572 |
| Community Foundation of New Jersey | $10,000 |
| The Philanthropy Roundtable | $10,000 |
| The Philanthropy Roundtable | $5,000 |
| Parents Anonymous of NJ | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMercy Center Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $679k · revenue +62%
HABCORE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $173k · revenue +48%- RSREVIVE SOUTH JERSEY2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +260%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF GLOUCESTER COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $550k · revenue -23% · 45% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $486k
- BABridgeton Area Police Athletic League Incone grant, 2021 · $204k · revenue ×29
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.
Promotes empowerment of low and middle income people through research, education, and training around public policy issues and direct counseling services.
Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…
New jersey institute for social justice (the institute), a public charity, is a newark-based urban research and advocacy organization dedicated to the advancement of new jersey's urban areas and residents.
To provide social and legal services that educate, empower and uplift working families.
We build a brighter future for children by promoting family wellness, positive parenting, healthy child development and nurturing communities.
To build the power of new jersey's nonprofit community to improve the quality of life for all people of our state.
The mission of the central jersey community development corporation is to rebuild communities, one family at a time by improving the social, educational, and economic conditions in targeted areas throughout the state of new jersey
New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) is a nonpartisan think tank that drives policy change to advance economic, social, and racial justice through evidence-based, independent research, analysis, and strategic communications.
To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.
The urban league's mission is to empower residents and improve the quality of life in urban communities by working in partnership with community groups, government and corporate sponsors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Advocacy Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Temple Vision Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mercy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Bridgeton Area Police Athletic League Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARTHUR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HABCORE INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ADVOCACY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds REVIVE SOUTH JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY GRANTMAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE VISION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Dean & Zoe Pappas Family Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pascale Sykes Foundation Inc 5575-00-42 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Advocacy Group Inc — 52% of income from government
- Habcore Inc — 50% of income from government
- Revive South Jersey — 38% of income from government
- Tri-County Community Action Agency Inc — 23% of income from government
- Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pascale Sykes Foundation Inc 5575-00-42?
Find your warmest path to Pascale Sykes Foundation Inc 5575-00-42 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.