Skip to content

· Public charity

Partnership Douglas County Inc

Col (f): organization's mission: we promote a healthy community through education and resource connection.

$388k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$175kCommunity Improvement$169kPublic Safety & Disaster$144kRecreation & Sports$87kYouth Development$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $226k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $129k
$17,841
Median grant
2
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEVADA CANCER COALITION$70,000
SUICIDE PREVENTION NETWORK$58,779
CARSON CITY COMMUNITY COUNSELING$39,266
HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION$34,049
THREE PEAKS THERAPY$30,150
Individual grant recipient$26,711
FRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION$19,296
CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION$18,675
MEFIYI REIMBURSEMENT$17,841
PACE COALITION$17,110
STEERED STRAIGHT INC$12,000
MISC LESS THAN 5000$10,496
NYE COMMUNITIES COALITION$9,483
Individual grant recipient$7,440
Individual grant recipient$6,780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $38k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $47k → 11%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $37k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $43k → 11%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $30k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $34k → 11%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $28k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $28k → 11%CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $19k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Partnership Douglas County Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 81%.

Partnership Douglas County Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 10 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$1.7M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-17%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    Suicide Prevention Network
    7× · 2017–2024 · $500k · revenue +196% · 47% of their budget
  • HC
    HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $173k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NYE COMMUNITIES COALITION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $169k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TY
    Tahoe Youth and Family Services
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership Carson City

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs,…

Youth Development
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
4
Northern Nevada Harm Reduction Alliance

Charitable

Health
5
Rise Up Reno Prevention Network

Creating healthier choices for children & youth in reno county through mentoring, substance use prevention, and strengthening families.

Youth Development
6
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
7
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—
8
Harrison County Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Inc

To provide an organization through which the community can plan and implement efforts to address the problems of substance abuse and dependency for the citizens of Harrison County.

Health
9
Sierra Harm Reduction Coalition

Provide a suite of community based harm reduction services aimed to improve the quality of life in the county through helping the drug using community by reducing the consequences of drug use.

Human Services
10
Nevada Healthright

Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.

Health
11
Phoenix Counseling Center Inc

Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.

Health
12
Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalition

The mission of the eastern nevada landscape coalition is to restore the dynamic and diverse landscapes of the arid and semi-arid west for present and future generations through education, research, advocacy, partnerships, and the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frontier Community Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Mefiyi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Suicide Prevention Network: $500,495 · HealthSuicide Prevention NetworkFRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION: $158,244 · HealthFRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITIONPARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE: $115,445 · HealthPARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCENEVADA CANCER COALITION: $70,000 · HealthNEVADA CANCER COALITIONCARSON CITY COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $39,266 · HealthDOUGLAS COUNTY: $156,105 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTYTHREE PEAKS THERAPY: $133,611 · OtherTHREE PEAKS THERAPYIndividual grant recipient: $26,711 · OtherIndividual grant recip…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN NV: $26,468 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF…+4 more: $30,116 · Other+4 moreHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES: $172,732 · Human ServicesHEALTHY COMMUNITIES …CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $151,706 · Human ServicesCHURCHILL COMMUNITY …+1 more: $9,734 · Human ServicesNYE COMMUNITIES COALITION: $169,434 · Community ImprovementNYE COMMUN…MEFIYI: $86,539 · Recreation & SportsSTEERED STRAIGHT INC: $12,000 · Education
Health$883,450Other$373,011Human Services$334,172Community Improvement$169,434Recreation & Sports$86,539Education$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSuicide Prevention Network: $500,495 over 7y, 47% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES: $172,732 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNYE COMMUNITIES COALITION: $169,434 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetFRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION: $158,244 over 5y, 10% of budgetCHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION: $151,706 over 5y, 10% of budgetPARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE: $115,445 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetMEFIYI: $86,539 over 6y, 19% of budgetNEVADA CANCER COALITION: $70,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSTEERED STRAIGHT INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTahoe Youth and Family Services: $9,734 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Suicide Prevention Network ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LYON AND STOREY COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds NYE COMMUNITIES COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHILL COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS ALLIED FOR COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds MEFIYI ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA CANCER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CARSON CITY COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STEERED STRAIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Tahoe Youth and Family Services ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Partnership Carson CityNV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Partnership Carson City · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partnership Douglas County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partnership Douglas County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Partnership Douglas County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Partnership Douglas County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Partnership Douglas County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph