Skip to content
Partners in Giving Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Partners in Giving Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$635kFood & Nutrition$72kPhilanthropy$63kHuman Services$62kInternational$35kHealth$24kEducation$19kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k44 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
$600
Median grant
7
States reached
$772k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOLDOS YESHURUN INC$49,450
FEDERATION JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF TH$15,275
CONG OHAIV YISROEL OF BLUEBERRY HIL$9,543
TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY$7,560
ANSHE CHESED INC$6,000
Individual grant recipient$4,100
YESHIVA TORAS EMES$2,950
KEREN HASHVEIS INC$2,500
SHAAREI TEFILLA OF NEW HEMPSTEAD$2,179
AM FR OF SHAVEI GOLAH JERUSALEM$2,120
KHAL AVREICHEM OF POMONA$2,100
CHAI LIFELINE$1,860
MY EXTENDED FAMILY$1,860
Individual grant recipient$1,800
ATERES BAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY OF ROCKL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KEREN SIMCHAS KALLAH: $2k → 11%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $1k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $500 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $396 → 11%RAJE-USA INC: $2k → 20%RAJE-USA INC: $2k → 20%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS - TORAS CHAIM KOLEL: $180 → 11%RAJE-USA INC: $2k → 20%RAJE-USA INC: $1k → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $20 → 11%RAJE-USA INC: $900 → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $4k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $3k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $2k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $2k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $2k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $2k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $1k → 20%PARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM LLC: $18k → 14%TIKVAH LEDOROS: $2k → 20%PARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM LLC: $2k → 14%PARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM LLC: $2k → 14%PARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM LLC: $2k → 14%CONGREGATION EMEK HAMISHPAT: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$915k · 84 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
152

Total granted

$915k
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TY
    TOLDOS YESHURUN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $243k · revenue +72%
  • TS
    TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +177%
  • KH
    KEREN HASHVIIS INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue ×127

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $122k
  • P
    PEF
    one grant, 2019 · $21k
  • CK
    CHEVRA KADISHA OF PETACH TIKVAH
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
11
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Beth Abraham of Jerusalem Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 256 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/72
Grantees still filing
37/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $122,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $80,390 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG OHAIV YISROEL OF BLUEBERRY HIL: $40,073 · OtherCONG OHAIV YISROEL OF BLUEBERRY HILIndividual grant recipient: $35,800 · Other+152 more: $406,356 · Other+152 moreTOLDOS YESHURUN INC: $242,812 · Arts & CultureTOLDOS YESHURUN INC+1 more: $4,632 · Arts & CultureKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $37,700 · ReligionKOLLEL TORAH INC: $12,100 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIRCHAS MORDECHAI: $11,500 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $5,100 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,300 · ReligionYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $4,000 · ReligionYehudi Inc: $3,360 · Religion+11 more: $14,080 · ReligionTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $71,620 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $3,740 · Food & NutritionFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $33,425 · PhilanthropyTZDAKA FOUNDATION INC: $13,700 · PhilanthropyJust One Chesed Inc: $7,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $5,210 · PhilanthropyNETIVOS OLAM: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,180 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM INC: $22,090 · Human ServicesMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $14,368 · Human ServicesRAJE-USA INC: $8,570 · Human ServicesTikva Ledoros Inc: $1,800 · Human ServicesKEREN SIMCHAS KALLAH: $1,800 · Human Services+3 more: $2,396 · Human ServicesMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $19,900 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $4,000 · EducationBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $1,000 · Education+4 more: $1,616 · Education
Other$684,619Arts & Culture$247,444Religion$92,140Food & Nutrition$75,360Philanthropy$67,015Human Services$51,024Education$26,516

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOLDOS YESHURUN INC: $242,812 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $71,620 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $37,700 over 5y, 18% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $33,425 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM INC: $22,090 over 4y, 18% of budgetMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $19,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $14,368 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTZDAKA FOUNDATION INC: $13,700 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH INC: $12,100 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIRCHAS MORDECHAI: $11,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $8,570 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $5,210 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $5,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNETIVOS OLAM: $5,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $4,632 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP DORA GOLDING: $4,620 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $3,740 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYehudi Inc: $3,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARIDY INC: $3,100 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetORA ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $2,230 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA BIRKAT ISRAEL INC: $2,080 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFederation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine INC: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVAAD LERABBONIM OF CHICAGO: $1,800 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetKEREN SIMCHAS KALLAH: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE 100 RIDE INC: $1,180 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH V SIMCHA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANI MAAMIN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEOROT HATORAH INC: $960 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $896 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HATZOLAH ASHDOD DAROM: $860 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ELEMENTARY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKS OF DAAS INC: $436 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVa'ad Ha'eruv of Rockland: $360 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOLDOS YESHURUN INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN SHIDDUCHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Mesivta Ahavas Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds TZDAKA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIRCHAS MORDECHAI ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Just One Chesed Inc ↗
  • Who funds TORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Ojc FundZichron Chaim Charity…The Jmg FoundationMarbeh Shalom Foundat…The Jimmy and Berta K…Jewish Communal FundAlyad Foundation IncZichron Yechiel Meche…Zichron Simcha DsassovKitov FoundationThe Weiskopf Family F…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY78.9× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Kitov Foundation · The Weiskopf Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners in Giving Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners in Giving Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Partners in Giving Inc?

Find your warmest path to Partners in Giving Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 256 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partners in Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home