Skip to content
Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc

Parkview wabash hospital, inc.

$372k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$233kCommunity Improvement$100kYouth Development$36kFood & Nutrition$12kArts & Culture$10kEducation$9kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $13,437, the rows itemized in this filing. The $372,384 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $358,947 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,437
Median grant
2
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTIS R BOWEN CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC$7,437
BLESSINGS IN A BACK PACK$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BLESSINGS IN A BACK PACK: $6k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACK PACK: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 5 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$381k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+195%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BOWEN HEALTH INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +142%
  • WC
    WABASH COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $36k · revenue +11%
  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • HL
    Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +195%
  • WC
    Wabash City Schools
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wabash County Business Alliance Inc

Together, growing a prosperous wabash county.

—
2
Wabash County Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote the development and growth of the convention, recreation, and visitor industry in wabash county, indiana.

Community Improvement
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Wabash County Farm Bureau

To improve the economic well being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life

—
5
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Arc of Wabash County Inc

The mission of arc of wabash county, inc. is to challenge, empower, and support individuals with disabilities to reach their highest level of independence. arc of wabash is dedicated to: 1) preserve, protect, and promote the dignity of…

Human Services
8
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana Chamber of Commerce Inc

To cultivate a world-class environment which provides economic opportunity and prosperity for the people of indiana and their enterprises. see schedule o.

—
10
Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc

Parkview wabash hospital, inc. works to improve the health of our communities and provides quality health services to all who entrust their care to us.

Health
11
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
12
Indiana Hospital Association Inc

The mission of indiana hospital association, inc. is to provide leadership, representation, and services in the common best interests of its members as they promote the improvement of community health status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Wabash County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wabash County Business Alliance Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARKVIEW WABASH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 · OtherPARKVIEW WABASH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCWABASH COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $36,350 · OtherWABASH COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCWabash City Schools: $8,500 · OtherWABASH COUNTY BUSINESS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementWABASH COUNTY BUSINESS ALLI…BOWEN HEALTH INC: $60,417 · HealthBOWEN HEALTH INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WABASH COUNTY INC: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$217,350Community Improvement$100,000Health$60,417Human Services$12,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKVIEW WABASH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetWABASH COUNTY BUSINESS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetBOWEN HEALTH INC: $60,417 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWABASH COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $36,350 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WABASH COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Aws Foundation IncLilly Endowment IncDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of Wabash County IncIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Wabash County Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parkview Wabash Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parkview Wabash Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home